FARMERS’ KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES AND PRACTICES ON OPEN BURNING REGULATION: A CASE STUDY OF SEKINCHAN, SELANGOR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v24i44.2280Keywords:
Open burning, Environmental regulation, Paddy farming, Knowledge–Attitude–Practice (KAP), Sustainable agricultureAbstract
Despite a regulatory prohibition under the Environmental Quality Act 1974, open burning persists in Malaysia. Enforcement challenges are particularly evident in agricultural areas because seasonal farming cycles often involve farmers burning crop residues to clear land. Certain open burning activities, including smallholder cultivation, are permitted under specified conditions. This study explores farmers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding the regulatory controls and the local community’s perception of the issue in Sekinchan, Selangor. Employing a mixed-methods approach, the study combined quantitative surveys involving 144 respondents with qualitative interviews and field observations. The data were subsequently triangulated to enhance validity. The findings indicate that farmers have a high level of knowledge of the legal prohibition. They are also willing to participate in government awareness initiatives. However, interview and observational findings suggest that actual compliance with procedural and environmental requirements remains inconsistent. Economic considerations, time constraints, limited access to practical alternatives, and entrenched cultural norms continue to influence farmers’ behaviour. The findings indicate gaps between regulatory awareness and implementation. Therefore, integrated enforcement strategies and feasible agricultural alternatives are required to support sustainable environmental governance, agricultural land management, and context-sensitive environmental planning in Selangor.
Downloads
References
Akahoshi, K., Zusman, E., Hanaoka, T., Kim Oanh, N. T., Huy, L. N., Wangwongwatana, S., & Amann, M. (2024). The prospects of controlling open burning of crop residues in Thailand: A quantitative assessment of implementation barriers and costs. Atmosphere, 15(11), 1309. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15111309
Aminrad, Z., Zakaria, S. Z. S., Hadi, A. S., & Sakari, M. (2013). Relationship between awareness, knowledge and attitudes towards environmental education among secondary school students in Malaysia. World Applied Sciences Journal, 22(9), 1326–1333.
Ariffin, M., & Wan Yacoob, W. N. A. (2017). Assessment of knowledge, attitude and practice of solid waste open burning in Terengganu, Malaysia. EnvironmentAsia, 10(2), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.14456/ea.2017.18
ASEAN. (2024). ASEAN guidelines on the reduction of crop burning. Jakarta, Indonesia: ASEAN Secretariat.
Asli, W. M. F., & Rahman, S. (2023). Conceptualising resilience livelihood strategies of paddy farmers towards Malaysia national food security agenda. Planning Malaysia, 21(4), 467–480. https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v21i28.1346
Badrum, S. Y., & Mapa, M. T. (2021). Waste management practices and government-led initiatives: Assessment of knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) level in a non-urban area. Borneo Akademika, 5(2), 69–78.
Costanza, J. & Moody, A. (2011). Deciding Where to Burn: Stakeholder Priorities for Prescribed Burning of a Fire-Dependent Ecosystem. Ecology and Society. 16 (1), 14–28.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Department of Environment Malaysia. (2020). Open burning under the Environmental Quality Act 1974. https://www.doe.gov.my/en/open-burning/
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610.
Liao, X., Nguyen, T. P. L., & Sasaki, N. (2022). Use of the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) model to examine sustainable agriculture in Thailand. Regional Sustainability, 3(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsus.2022.03.005
MARDI. (2019). Paddy post‑harvest practices and waste management in Selangor. Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute.
Mustafa, M., Yaacob, A., Ariffin, M., & Rosli, M. H. (2017). Forest protection and air pollution control from open burning: Application of prescribed burning under environmental law in Malaysia. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities (PASAK 2017), 26–27 April 2017.
Na Talang, R. P., Na Sorn, W., Polruang, S., & Sirivithayapakorn, S. (2024). Alternative crop residue management practices to mitigate the environmental and economic impacts of open burning of agricultural residues. Scientific Reports, 14, 14372. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-65389-3
Rosmiza, M. Z., Rose, R. A. C., Mapjabil, J., & Marzuki, M. (2019). The potential of rice straw in agricultural activities in the MADA region of Kedah, Malaysia. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 9(4), 295–303. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.1.2019.94.295.303.
Sawal, P., & Tsai, K. F. (2016). Managing peatland: Regulating controlled open burning in Sarawak. Paper presented at the 15th International Peat Congress 2016, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia.
Erbaugh, J., Singh, S., Luo, Z., Koppa, G., Evans, J., & Shyamsundar, P. (2024). Farmer perspectives on crop residue burning and sociotechnical transition in Punjab, India. Journal of Rural Studies, 103, 103387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103387
Taweesan, A., Lalitaporn, P., Sooktawee, S., & Kanabkaew, T. (2025). Mitigating air quality and climate impact: A comprehensive analysis of paddy field burning emissions and green mechanisms for sustainable agriculture. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 26, 100662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2025.100662
Zahari, M. A. Z., Majid, M. R., Siong, H. C., Nordin, N., & Kurata, G. (2016). An investigation on the relationship between land use composition and PM10 pollution in Iskandar Malaysia. Planning Malaysia, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v14i4.173
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright & Creative Commons Licence
eISSN: 0128-0945 © Year. The Authors. Published for Malaysian Institute of Planners. This is an open-access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
The authors hold the copyright without restrictions and also retain publishing rights without restrictions.