QUANTITY SURVEYORS AS ENABLERS OF ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE INTEGRATION IN THE MALAYSIAN CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY

Authors

  • Iris Ng Chin Rou Centre for Building, Construction & Tropical Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI MALAYA
  • Mohd Suhaimi Mohd-Danuri Centre for Building, Construction & Tropical Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI MALAYA
  • Mahanim Hanid Centre for Building, Construction & Tropical Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI MALAYA
  • Zul Zakiyuddin Ahmad Rashid School of Housing, Building and Planning, UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA
  • Mohd Hanizun Hanafi Faculty of Architecture and Ekistics, UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA KELANTAN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v24i44.2270

Abstract

The increasing emphasis on sustainability in the Malaysian construction industry highlights the importance of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) practices as a structured approach to sustainable development. As a major contributor to Malaysia’s economic growth, the construction sector faces growing pressure to balance economic performance with ESG considerations. This study explores the evolving role of Quantity Surveyors (QSs) as enablers of ESG practices in the Malaysian construction industry. ESG indicators from the FTSE Russell ESG Scores published by Bursa Malaysia were used to examine the alignment between ESG principles and QS professional practices across construction stages. A qualitative approach was adopted through semi-structured interviews with six middle-management professionals from contractor firms. The findings reveal that QSs contribute significantly to ESG implementation through green procurement, occupational safety and health (OSH), and ethical governance. However, implementation is constrained by resistance to change, supply chain limitations, reporting challenges, project characteristics, and limited client support. The study highlights the need for stronger governance, digital solutions, incentives, standardized ESG reporting, and greater involvement of professional bodies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aag, R. P., & Latief, Y. (2023). Identification of Quantity Surveyor Competency Risk for Cost Overrun. Devotion: Journal of Research and Community Service, 4(9), 1843–1850. https://doi.org/10.59188/devotion.v4i9.531

Adams, J., Khan, H. T. A., Raeside, R., & White, D. (2007). Research Methods for Graduate Business and Social Science Students. https://doi.org/10.4135/9788132108498

Aduwo, E. B., Ibem, E. O., Afolabi, A., Oluwunmi, A. O., Tunji-Olayeni, P. F., Ayo-Vaughan, E. A., … & Oni, A. A. (2020). Exploring anti-corruption capabilities of e-procurement in construction project delivery in Nigeria. Construction Economics and Building, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.5130/ajceb.v20i1.6964

Ahmad, R. A. R., Ayob, A. A., Zainon, S., & Probohudono, A. N. (2021). The Influence of Environmental, Social and Governance Reporting on Firm Value: Malaysian Evidence. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v11-i9/10877

Akomea-Frimpong, I., Agar, C. E., Alidu, A., Ohenewaa-Ayisi, M. Y., Baah, B., Oduro, S., … & Boadi, C. (2024). A literature review of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) indicators in the Construction Industry. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202408.0203.v1

Anifowose, M. O., Ola-awo, W. A., & Mohammed, T. U. (2013). Assessment of Cost Management Functions of Quantity Surveyors with Lean Methodology. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 4(2), 67–81.

Anugwo, I., & Okorie, V. (2021). Quantity Surveyors Role in the Construction Health and Safety Management in Nigeria. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 654(1), 012020. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/654/1/012020

Atan, R., Alam, M., Said, J., & Zamri, M. (2018). The impacts of environmental, social, and governance factors on firm performance. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 29(2), 182–194. https://doi.org/10.1108/meq-03-2017-0033

Bamahros, H. M., Alquhaif, A., Qasem, A., Wan‐Hussin, W. N., Thomran, M., Al-Duais, S. D., … & Khojally, H. M. A. (2022). Corporate Governance Mechanisms and ESG Reporting: Evidence from the Saudi Stock Market. Sustainability, 14(10), 6202. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106202

Baran, M., Kuźniarska, A., Makieła, Z. J., Sławik, A., & Stuss, M. M. (2022). Does ESG reporting relate to corporate financial performance in the context of the energy sector transformation? Evidence from Poland. Energies, 15(2), 477. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15020477

Bonifazi, G., Grosso, C., Palmieri, R., & Serranti, S. (2025). Current trends and challenges in construction and demolition waste recycling. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 53, 101032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2025.101032

Cedervall, Y., & Åberg, A. C. (2010). Physical activity and implications on well-being in mild Alzheimer's disease: A qualitative case study on two men with dementia and their spouses. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 26(4), 226–239. https://doi.org/10.3109/09593980903423012

Chodnicka-Jaworska, P. (2021). ESG as a Measure of Credit Ratings. Risks, 9(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/risks9120226

Duuren, E. v., Plantinga, A., & Scholtens, B. (2015). ESG Integration and the Investment Management Process: Fundamental Investing Reinvented. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(3), 525–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2610-8

Fernández, C. G., Evandio, D. Y., & Riantono, I. E. (2025). Corporate governance and ESG strategies: The moderating impact of internal audit quality on financial performance in Indonesian companies. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 9(5), 685–702. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v9i5.6983

Gong, X., Tao, X., Das, M., Kwok, H., & Cheng, J. C. (2023). Integrating ESG Factors into Construction Projects: A Blockchain-Based Data Management Approach. Proceedings E Report, 327–334. https://doi.org/10.36253/979-12-215-0289-3.31

Gupta, P., Pranjal, P., Bera, S., Sarkar, S., & Sachan, A. (2020). Performance improvement of supplier-side e-tender-driven marketing process. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 70(8), 2032–2051. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijppm-11-2019-0534

Hossain, M. I., Qi, B., Marie, M., Omran, M., & Chen, Y. (2024). Financial sustainability in the context of ESG disclosure: A comprehensive analysis of Chinese‐listed firms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(2), 2438–2457. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.3072

iSaham. (2025). Construction. https://www.isaham.my/sector/construction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.03.001

Kamińska-Witkowska, A., & Matuszak-Flejszman, A. (2023). Possibility of using EMAS environmental reporting requirements for ESG reporting in selected automotive corporations. Economics and Environment, 85(2), 347–368. https://doi.org/10.34659/eis.2023.85.2.588

Khan, L., Tong, N., & Phung, Q. (2024). Isn’t it time for Quantity Surveyors to contribute to Sustainability? International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 15(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.30880/ijscet.2024.15.03.001

Kocmanova, A., Nemecek, P., & Docekalova, M. (2012). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) key performance indicators for sustainable reporting. https://doi.org/10.3846/bm.2012.085

Laari, S., Wetzel, P., Töyli, J., & Solakivi, T. (2022). Leveraging supply chain networks for sustainability beyond corporate boundaries: Explorative structural network analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 377, 134475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134475

Latif, S. D., Usman, F., & Pirot, B. M. (2020). Implementation of Value Engineering in Optimizing Project Cost for Sustainable Energy Infrastructure Asset Development. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 15(7), 1045–1057. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.150709

Lin, W. L. (2023). The role of corporate social responsibility and corporate social irresponsibility in shaping corporate reputation: An analysis of competitive action and innovation strategies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(2), 1451–1468. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2640

LSEG. (2025). FTSE Russell ESG Scores. https://www.lseg.com/content/dam/ftse-russell/en_us/documents/policy-documents/ftse-russell-esg-data-model-methodology.pdf

Ma, T., & Luu, H. (2013). The changing role of quantity surveyors in the green building development in South Australia. (Doctoral dissertation, Australasian University Building Educators Association).

Maryssa, H., Sabri, M., Fawwaz, A., Nasarudin, M., Hartini, A., & Azaimi, A. (2022). The Effect On Stock Price Inclusion Or Exclusion From The FTSE4GOOD Bursa Malaysia. Management and Accounting Review, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.24191/mar.v21i03-04

Mooney-Somers, J., Perz, J., & Ussher, J. M. (2008). A Complex Negotiation: Women's Experiences of Naming and Not Naming Premenstrual Distress in Couple Relationships. Women & Health, 47(3), 57–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/03630240802134134

Ngu, S. B., & Amran, A. (2020). The Moderating Effect Of Risk Management Committee On Corporate Governance And Financial Performance. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 106–119. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2020.10.10

Njie, B., & Asimiran, S. (2014). Case study as a choice in qualitative methodology. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 4(3), 35–40.

Omotayo, T., Tan, S. W., & Ekundayo, D. (2022). Sustainable construction and the versatility of the quantity surveying profession in Singapore. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 12(2), 435–457. https://doi.org/10.1108/sasbe-07-2021-0125

Osunsanwo, H. F., & Dada, J. O. (2019). Evaluating quantity surveying firms’ performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 69(1), 134–152. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijppm-06-2018-0209

Rahim, N. S. A., Ismail, S., Subramaniam, C., Habib, S. N. H. A., & Durdyev, S. (2023). Building Information Modelling Strategies in Sustainable Housing Construction Projects in Malaysia. Sustainability, 15(3), 2313. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032313

RISM. (2021). Quantity Surveying Division (QS). https://rism.org.my/quantity-surveying-division-qs/

Scott, K., Owen, A., & Barrett, J. (2013). Estimating emissions associated with future UK consumption patterns. Sustainability Research Institute, University of Leeds. https://www.theccc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Leeds_Report_Consumption_Emission_Scenarios_2013-06.pdf

Sulaiman, K., Mei, K. J., Mohd Danuri, M. S., Mustafa, M. H., & Ahmad Shuhaimi, A. A. (2025). Exploring Capacity Development Initiatives for Promoting Growth and Sustainability of Small and Medium-Sized Quantity Surveying Firms in Malaysia. Planning Malaysia, 23. https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v23i38.1803

Sulaiman, N. N., Omar, A. J., Pakir, F., & Mohamad, M. (2024). Evaluating Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Practice Among Malaysian Public Listed Construction Companies Using FTSE Russell Rating Model. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 15(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.30880/ijscet.2024.15.01.003

Sulaiman, N. N., Omar, A. J., Sulaiman, M. A., Adi Maimun, N. H., & Abdul Manaf, A. (2026). Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Disclosure for Construction Sector in Bursa Malaysia. Planning Malaysia, 24(40). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v24i40.1960

Tóth, Á., Szigeti, C., & Suta, A. (2021). Carbon Accounting Measurement with Digital Non-Financial Corporate Reporting and a Comparison to European Automotive Companies Statements. Energies, 14(18), 5607. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14185607

Villarreal-Samaniego, D., Santillán‐Salgado, R. J., & Escobar-Saldívar, L. J. (2021). The Global Automotive Industry Stock Returns During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Revista Mexicana de Economía y Finanzas, 17(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.21919/remef.v17i4.800

Widia, E., & Wibisono, C. (2024). ESG Implementation in Modern Business Oriented Towards Sustainable Management. International Journal of Environmental Sustainability and Social Science, 5(3), 850–856. https://doi.org/10.38142/ijesss.v5i3.1128

Wong, W., Ahmad, A., Mohamed-Arshad, S., Nordin, S., & Adzis, A. (2022). Environmental, Social and Governance Performance: Continuous Improvement Matters. Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies, 59(1), 49–69. https://doi.org/10.22452/mjes.vol59no1.3

Yang, K., Kim, K., & Go, S. (2021). Towards Effective Safety Cost Budgeting for Apartment Construction: A Case Study of Occupational Safety and Health Expenses in South Korea. Sustainability, 13(3), 1335. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031335

Yang, O.-S., & Han, J.-H. (2023). Assessing the Effect of Corporate ESG Management on Corporate Financial & Market Performance and Export. Sustainability, 15(3), 2316. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032316

Yap, J. B. H., Skitmore, M., Lim, Y. W., Loo, S. C., & Gray, J. (2021). Assessing the expected current and future competencies of quantity surveyors in the Malaysian built environment. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(6), 2415–2436. https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-01-2021-0091

Zhang, P., Ma, S.-G., Sun, Y., & Zhao, Y.-N. (2024). Investigating the Gaps between Engineering Graduates and Quantity Surveyors of Construction Enterprises. Sustainability, 16(7), 2984. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072984

Downloads

Published

2026-10-07

How to Cite

Rou, I. N. C., Mohd-Danuri, M. S., Hanid, M., Ahmad Rashid, Z. Z., & Hanafi, M. H. (2026). QUANTITY SURVEYORS AS ENABLERS OF ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE INTEGRATION IN THE MALAYSIAN CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 24(44). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v24i44.2270

Most read articles by the same author(s)