SOCIAL NORM AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN AS THE PREDICTORS OF CITIZENS’ ACTUAL BEHAVIOUR TO ADOPT PUBLIC TRANSPORT IN TERENGGANU, MALAYSIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v22i30.1425Keywords:
Environmental concern, Public transport, Social norm, Environment, SustainabilityAbstract
The increasing penetration of private motor vehicles for commuting demonstrates an astonishing vehicle reliance in Malaysia. The use of public transport could provide a promising alternative by enabling accessibility, reducing congestion and fatalities, and mitigating environmental problems especially in densely populated areas. However, the utilisation of public transport does not depend only on the intention but the actual use as well. Understanding individuals' readiness to adopt public transport are critical for improving sustainable mobility. Based on the theory of Interpersonal Behaviour (TIB), this study aims to assess the individuals' behavioural readiness to use for public transportation to improve sustainable mobility instead of using single-occupancy vehicles in Terengganu, Malaysia. This quantitative survey is distributed on 200 citizens at four densely-populated locations in cities of Terengganu, namely Kuala Terengganu, Chukai, Dungun and Jerteh. Data analysis is analysed using structural equation modelling of partial least squares (PLS-SEM). The empirical results indicate that social norm and environmental concern are the main predictor that affecting the behavioural readiness on adopting public transport among the respondents. However, perceived value and affective construct do not have significant impact on citizens’ readiness to use public transport. Policy implications like enhancing service quality, promoting environmental benefits and implementing visible safety measures are addressed. As cities continue to invest in and prioritize public transport, they contribute to a more sustainable and resilient transportation landscape.
Downloads
References
Abd Rahman, N. A., & Abdullah, Y. A. (2016). Theorizing the concept of urban public transportation institutional framework in Malaysia. MATEC Web of Conferences, 66, 00043.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.
Azinuddin, M., Shariffuddin, N. S. M., Som, A. P. M., Salim, M. A. M., & Eppang, B. M. (2023). Interrelationship of networks, knowledge, and performance of businesses through the lens of coastal destination development. Planning Malaysia, 21(4), 376-389.
Azinuddin, M., Zain, W. M. A. W. M., & Shariffuddin, N. S. M. (2022). Tourism Sustainability: Perspectives on Past Works, Issues and Future Research Opportunities. In Environmental Management and Sustainable Development: Case Studies and Solutions from Malaysia (pp. 39-51). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Beckmann, M. J. (2013). Traffic congestion and what to do about it. Transportmetrica B.
Bourke, M., Craike, M., & Hilland, T. A. (2019). Moderating effect of gender on the associations of perceived attributes of the neighbourhood environment and social norms on transport cycling behaviours. Journal of Transport and Health.
Chan, D. (2022). Vehicles outnumber people in malaysia. New Straits Times.
Currie, G., & Wallis, I. (2008). Effective ways to grow urban bus markets - a synthesis of evidence. Journal of Transport Geography.
Department of Statistics Malaysia -DOSM (2020). https://www.dosm.gov.my/portal-main/landingv2
Gärling, T., R. Gillholm, and A. Gärling (1998) Reintroducing attitude theory in travel behavior research: The validity of an interactive interview procedure to predict car use. Transportation, 25 (2), 129-146.
Gollwitzer, P. M. (1993). Goal Achievement: The Role of Intentions. European Review of Social Psychology.
Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European business review, 31(1), 2-24.
Hair, J., Hult, G., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer of partial least square structural equation model (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). CA: SAGE.
Heckhausen, H. (1991). Volition: Implementation of Intentions. In Motivation and Action.
Heckhausen, H., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1987). Thought contents and cognitive functioning in motivational versus volitional states of mind. Motivation and Emotion.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 43, 115-135.
Kang, A. S., Jayaraman, K., Soh, K. L., & Wong, W. P. (2019). Convenience, flexible service, and commute impedance as the predictors of drivers’ intention to switch and behavioral readiness to use public transport. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
Kang, A. S., Jayaraman, K., Soh, K. L., & Wong, W. P. (2020). Tackling single-occupancy vehicles to reduce carbon emissions: Actionable model of drivers’ implementation intention to try public buses. Journal of Cleaner Production.
Mifsud, D., Attard, M., & Ison, S. (2019). An exploratory study of the psychological determinants of mobility of older people in Malta. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 30, 100373.
Minhans, A., Chatterjee, A., & Popli, S. (2020). Public perceptions: an important determinant of transport users' travel behaviour. Human Geographies--Journal of Studies & Research in Human Geography, 14(2).
Mustaffa, H., Kamarudin, M. K. A., Toriman, M. E., Rosli, M. H., Sunardi, S. (2023). Impact of Suspended Sediment on Pahang River Development using Geographic Information System. Planning Malaysia, 21(1), 116 – 133.
Neuber, T. E. (2021). Egocentric norm adoption (No. 116). ECONtribute Discussion Paper.
Ng, P. Y., & Phung, P. T. (2021). Public transportation in Hanoi: Applying an integrative model of behavioral intention. Case studies on transport policy, 9(2), 395-404.
Redman, L., Friman, M., Gärling, T., & Hartig, T. (2013). Quality attributes of public transport that attract car users: A research review. Transport Policy.
Rezaimoghadam, M.R, Nooradin, Dabiri., Seyed, Rasoul, Davoodi. (2022). Public transportation users’ behavior based on theory of planned behavior.
Ringle, C.M., Wende, S., Becker, J.M. (2015), Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH. http://www.smartpls.com.
Saad, M. H. M., Kamarudin, M. K. A., Toriman, M. E., Wahab, N.A, Ata, F. M., Samah, M. A. A., Manoktong, S. N. (2023). Analysis of the Flash Flood Event and Rainfall Distribution Pattern on Relau River Basin Development, Penang, Malaysia. Planning Malaysia, 21(1), 58-71.
Salleh, N. S. N. M., Zin, S. M., Abdullah, I. H. T., Sulaiman, W. A. T. W., & Ismail, W. N. A. T. (2023). Developing talent and performance of government employees, capacitate malaysia’s development plan. Planning Malaysia, 21(6), 144-156.
Silva, J., Sá, E. S., Escadas, M., & Carvalho, J. (2021). The influence of ambient scent on the passengers’ experience, emotions and behavioral intentions: An experimental study in a Public Bus service. Transport Policy, 106, 88-98.
Tomtom traffic index. Traffic Index ranking | TomTom Traffic Index. (2023, October 27). https://www.tomtom.com/traffic-index/ranking/
Triandis, H. C. (1980). Values, attitudes, and interpersonal behavior. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.
Wilson, H. F. (2011). Passing propinquities in the multicultural city: The everyday encounters of bus passengering. Environment and Planning A. https://doi.org/10.1068/a43354.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright & Creative Commons Licence
eISSN: 0128-0945 © Year. The Authors. Published for Malaysian Institute of Planners. This is an open-access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
The authors hold the copyright without restrictions and also retain publishing rights without restrictions.
