DEVELOPING SUSTAINABLE URBAN REGENERATION (SUR) EVALUATION METHOD FOR THE MALAYSIAN CONTEXT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v21i30.1389Keywords:
urban regeneration, sustainable urban regeneration (SUR), sustainability performance, indicators, evaluation method, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)Abstract
Sustainable urban regeneration (SUR) represents an advanced and comprehensive approach to urban regeneration, aiming to integrate the three key pillars of sustainable development. While various global framework exist for measuring sustainable urban regeneration performance, a dedicated method tailored to the specificities of the Malaysian context remains absent. This study addresses this gap by developing SUR evaluation method for Malaysia, utilising indicators as a means to gauge sustainability performance. A self-administered questionnaire was employed to solicit assessments from key experts regarding potential SUR criteria and indicators. The resulting data were analysed using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to establish weightage based on priority scales. Results from the study identified ten (10) fundamental criteria and thirty-three (33) indicators, each assigned respective weightage, pivotal in achieving sustainable urban regeneration. This study contributes to the improvement of sustainability performance of urban regeneration initiatives in Malaysia by introducing a novel evaluation method. As a way forward, it is recommended that the practicality and capability of the proposed evaluation method be assessed through real-life case study in Malaysia.
Downloads
References
Audit Commission (2002). Suggested Key Indicators for Economic Regeneration. HMSO: London.
Balaban, O. (2013). The use of indicators to assess urban regeneration performance for climate-friendly urban development: The case of Yokohama Minato Mirai 21. Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development. Dordrecht: Springer, 91–115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5922-0_6
Berke, P. (2002). Does Sustainable Development Offer a New Direction for Planning? Challenges for the Twenty-First Century. Journal of Planning Literature, 17(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/088122017001002
Boyle, L.; Michell, K.; Viruly, F. (2018). A critique of the application of neighborhood sustainability. Assessment Tools in Urban Regeneration, 10(4), 1005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041005
Burrage, H. (2011). Green hubs, social inclusion and community engagement. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Municipal Engineer, 164(3), 167–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/muen.900030
Cahantimur, A.I.; Öztürk, R.E.; Öztürk A.C. (2010). Securing land for urban transformation through sustainable brownfield regeneration – the case of Eskişehir, Turkey. Environment & Urbanization, 22(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247809362641
Chan, E.H.W.; Lee, G.K.L. (2006). Design-led sustainable urban renewal approach for Hong Kong. The HKIA Journal, 46, 76–81.
Chan, E.; Lee, G.K.L. (2008). Critical factors for improving social sustainability of urban renewal projects. Social Indicators Research, 85, 243–256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9089-3
Conte, E.; Monno, V. (2012). Beyond the building centric approach: A vision for an integrated evaluation of sustainable buildings. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 34, 31–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2011.12.003
Couch, C.; Sykes, O.; Börstinghaus, W. (2011). Thirty years of urban regeneration in Britain, Germany and France: The importance of context and path dependency. Progress in Planning. 75, 1–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2010.12.001
Dahl, A. (2012). Achievements and gaps in indicators for sustainability. Ecological Indicators, 17, 14–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.032
DETR (Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions). (1998). A New Deal for Transport: Better for Everyone. HMSO: London.
Evans, J.; Jones, P. (2008). Rethinking sustainable urban regeneration: Ambiguity, creativity, and the shared territory. Environment and Planning A., 40, 1416–1434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/a39293
Hashim, N.H.N. (2021). A Framework for Sustainable Urban Regeneration (SUR) in Historical Inner Cities: The Case of KL Sentral. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Hemphill, L.; Berry, J.; McGreal, S. (2004a). An Indicator-based Approach to Measuring Sustainable Urban Regeneration Performance: Part 1, Conceptual Foundations and Methodological Framework. Urban Studies, 41(4), 725–755. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098042000194089
Hemphill, L.; Berry, J.; McGreal, S. (2014). A financial appraisal of business improvement districts in the UK. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32, 680–696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/c12221b
Hemphill, L.; McGreal, S.; Berry, J. (2002). An aggregated weighting system for evaluating sustainable urban regeneration. Journal of Property Research, 19(4), 353–373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09599910210155491
Hemphill, L.; McGreal, S.; Berry, J. (2004b). An Indicator-based Approach to Measuring Sustainable Urban Regeneration Performance: Part 2, Empirical Evaluation and Case-study Analysis. Urban Studies, 41(4), 757–772. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098042000194098
Horn, R.V. (1993). Statistical Indicators for the Economic & Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press: New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511518164
Huang, L.; Zheng, W.; Hong, J.; Liu, Y.; Liu, G. (2020). Paths and strategies for sustainable urban renewal at the neighbourhood level: A framework for decision-making. Sustainable Cities and Society, 55, 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102074
Hunt D.V.; Lombardi D.R.; Rogers, C.D., et al. (2008). Application of sustainability indicators in decision-making processes for urban regeneration projects. Proceedings of the ICE-Engineering Sustainability, 161, 77–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/ensu.2008.161.1.77
Innes J.E.; Booher, D.E. (2000). Indicators for Sustainable Communities: A Strategy Building on Complexity Theory and Distributed Intelligence. Planning Theory & Practice, 1(2), 173–186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350020008378
Kleinhans, R. J. (2012). Housing policies and regeneration. International Encyclopedia of Housing and Home, 590–595. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-047163-1.00243-5
Korkmaz, C.; Balaban, O. (2020). Sustainability of urban regeneration in Turkey: Assessing the performance of the North Ankara Urban Regeneration Project. Habitat International, 95, 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.102081
Lee, J.H.; Lim, S. (2018). An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Approach for Sustainable Assessment of Economy-Based and Community-Based Urban Regeneration: The Case of South Korea. Sustainability, 10, 4456, 1–14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124456
Majid, M. R., Lim, N. H. H., Zaman, M., & Ruslik, N. (2021). Exploring the Link between BMI, Perceived Neighbourhood Environment and Health Behaviours in Malaysia. Journal of Sustainability Science and Management, 16(7), 190-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46754/jssm.2021.10.015
Omann, I.; Spangenberg, J.H. (2002). Assessing Social Sustainability: The Social Dimension of Sustainability in a Socio-Economic Scenario. Presented at the 7th Biennial Conference of the International Society for Ecological Economic” in Sousse (Tunisia).
Peng, Y.; Lai, Y.; Li, X.; Zhang, X. (2015). An alternative model for measuring the sustainability of urban regeneration: the way forward. Journal of Cleaner Production, 109, 76–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.143
Ramlan, N. H., Osman, M. M., Rabe, N. S., Azizan, A., Azmi, N. A., & Amiruddin, S. (2021). Assessing The Current Implementation of Compact and Mixed-Use Development Within Public Rail Transit Stations in Malaysia. Planning Malaysia, 19(15). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v19i15.934 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v19i15.934
Rosly, D.; Rashid, A.A. (2013). Revitalizing Urban Development in Malaysia Through the Implementation of Urban Regeneration Programme. Paper presented at 43rd Annual Conference of the Urban Affairs Association, San Francisco California, United States of America, 3-6 April 2013.
Saaty, T.L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
Shutkin, W.A. (2000). The Land That Could Be: Environmentalism and Democracy in the Twenty-First Century (Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4091.001.0001
Stiglitz, J.E. (2001). Employment, Social Justice, and Societal Well-being. ILO Global Employment Forum 1, Columbia University. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2002.tb00229.x
Teh, B.T.; Shinozaki, M.; Chau, L.W.; Ho, C.S. (2019). Using Building Floor Space for Station Area Population and Employment Estimation. Urban Science, 3(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci3010012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci3010012
Turcu, C. (2012). Local experiences of urban sustainability: Researching Housing Market Renewal interventions in three English neighbourhoods. Progress in Planning, 78, 101–150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2012.04.002
Zawawi, N.A.W.A.; Abdullah, A. (2011). Evaluating Stakeholders’ Preferences: Reconciling Heritage and Sustainability in Kuala Lumpur Traditional Areas. Planning Malaysia, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v9i2.84 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21837/pmjournal.v9.i2.84
Winston, N. (2009). Urban Regeneration for Sustainable Development: The Role of Sustainable Housing? European Planning Studies, 17(12), 1781–1796. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310903322306
Wong, C. (2002). Indicators in use: challenges to urban and environmental planning in Britain. Town Planning Review, 71(2), 213–239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.71.2.tu716xu205jl430t
Yung, E.H.K.; Chan, E.H.W. (2012). Implementation challenges to the adaptive reuse of heritage buildings: Towards the goals of sustainable, low carbon cities. Habitat International, 36, 352–361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.11.001
Zheng, H.W.; Shen, G.Q.P.; Song, Y.; Sun, B.; Hong, J. (2017). Neighborhood sustainability in urban renewal: An assessment framework. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 44(5), 903–924. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265813516655547
Zheng, H.W.; Shen, G.Q.P; Wang, H. (2014). A review of recent studies on sustainable urban renewal. Habitat International, 41, 272–279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.08.006
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright & Creative Commons Licence
eISSN: 0128-0945 © Year. The Authors. Published for Malaysia Institute of Planners. This is an open-access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
The authors hold the copyright without restrictions and also retain publishing rights without restrictions.
