KEY APPROACHES OF LIFE-CYCLE COST IN GREEN GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT (GGP) FOR GREEN PROJECTS

Authors

  • Natasha Khalil Department of Built Environment Studies & Technology Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Surveying UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA, PERAK BRANCH, MALAYSIA
  • Asmah Alia Mohamad Bohari Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Surveying UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA, SARAWAK BRANCH, MALAYSIA
  • Siti Mazzuana Shamsudin Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Surveying UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA, SHAH ALAM, MALAYSIA
  • Ahmad Faiz Abd Rashid Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Surveying UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA, SARAWAK BRANCH, MALAYSIA
  • Husrul Nizam Husin Department of Built Environment Studies & Technology Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Surveying UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA, PERAK BRANCH, MALAYSIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v19i16.949

Keywords:

Life cycle cost, government green procurement, planning phase, green projects

Abstract

Sustainability has emerged as a critical concern in any viable physical planning and development. Hence, the Malaysian government has promoted the concept of green procurement also known as Government Green Procurement (GGP) that aims to minimize environmental degradation. In GGP, life cycle perspective thinking is introduced where life-cycle cost (LCC) tools act as decision-making in controlling the initial and future value of building ownership. Despite the increasing importance of green procurement and LCC in the planning phase of green projects, the viability and implementation of LCC is still lacking. Many have stated the benefits of LCC in green procurement for green building projects, however the criteria of LCC are not clearly determined. The study aims to determine the important level of LCC components relating to the green project planning phase. Questionnaire survey was distributed to 50 respondents composed of project team members that were involved in the selected green government projects. 32 respondents returned their responses to the survey. The results revealed that the highest rank of LCC components in green procurement is energy consumption cost, greenhouse gas (GHG) savings cost, acquisition cost, energy simulation cost and utilities cost. These results would elevate the use of LCC in the green procurement adoption and viability of green projects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abu Bakar, A., Mustapa, S.I., Mohammad, N. (2020). Environmental behaviours in the Model Green City of Melaka. Planning Malaysia Journal of the Malaysian Institute of Planners, 18(4), 375–386.

Abdul Lateef A, O. (2013). A critical review of value management and whole life costing on construction projects. International Journal of Facility Management, 4(1), 1–12.

Adham, K. N., Siwar, C., & Abdul Ghani Aziz, S. A. (2015). Kajian Empirikal Amalan Perolehan Hijau Kerajaan di Malaysia. In Persidangan Kebangsaan Ekonomi Malaysia ke-10 (PERKEM 10) (Vol. 10, pp. 338–349).

Antoniadou, P., & Papadopoulos, A. M. (2017). Development of an Integrated, Personalized Comfort. Energies, 10(10), 1202–1230.

Asmone, A. S., & Chew, M. Y. L. (2018). Merging building maintainability and sustainability assessment: A multicriteria decision making approach. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 117(1), 0–7.

Bohari, A. A. M., Skitmore, M., Xia, B., & Teo, M. (2017). Green oriented procurement for building projects: Preliminary findings from Malaysia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 148, 690–700.

Bohari, A. A. M., Skitmore, M., Xia, B., Teo, M., & Khalil, N. (2020). Key stakeholder values in encouraging green orientation of construction procurement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 270, 122246.

Buniamin, S., Ahmad, N., Rauf, F. H. A., Johari, N. H., & Rashid, A. A. (2016). Green Government Procurement Practices (GGP) in Malaysian Public Enterprises. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35(16), 27–34.

Chew, M. Y. L., Conejos, S., & Asmone, A. S. (2017). Developing a research framework for the green maintainability of buildings. Facilities, 35(1–2), 39–63.

Chua, Y. P. (2011). Kaedah Penyelidikan: Edisi Kedua (Kaedah dan Statistik Penyelidikan. Buku 1). McGraw Hill, Malaysia

Conejos, S., Chew, M. Y. L., & Azril, F. H. Bin. (2019). Green maintainability assessment of high-rise vertical greenery systems. Facilities, 37(13–14), 1008–1047.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th Editio). Pearson Education.

Dwaikata, L. N., & Ali, K. N. (2018). Green Buildings Life Cycle Cost Analysis and Life Cycle Budget Development: Practical Applications. Journal of Building Engineering, 18(July), 303–311.

EPU (2008). Garis Panduan dan Peraturan Bagi Perancangan Bangunan oleh Jawatankuasa Standard dan Kos Unit Perancang Ekonomi, Jabatan Perdana Menteri: Malaysia.

EPU (2020). 12th Malaysia Plan. Economic Planning Unit, Smart Partnership with Malaysian Administrative Modernisation and Management Planning Unit (MAMPU) https://rmke12.epu.gov.my/about-us

European Commission (2016). Communication From The Commission To The European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic And Social Committee And The

Committee Of The Regions. https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2016/EN/1-2016-356-EN-F1-1.PDF

Giacomo, M. R. De, Testa, F., Iraldo, F., & Formentini, M. (2019). Does Green Public Procurement lead to Life Cycle Costing (LCC) adoption? Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 25(3), 100500.

Hair, J., Anderso, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Heng, J. Y., Safian, E. E. M., & Ramin, A. K. (2019). Sustainable Business Location Characteristics Of Purpose-Built Offices In Malaysia. Planning Malaysia Journal of the Malaysian Institute of Planners, 17(1), 232–239.

Heralova, R.S., 2014. Life Cycle Costing in the preparation of public works contracts. International Scientific Conference:

People, Building and Environment (PBE 2014), October 2014, Czeck Republic, pp. 15–17.

Higham, A., Fortune, C., James, H., 2015. Life Cycle Costing: evaluating its use in UK practice. Structural Survey, 33(1), 73–87.

Kahlenborn, W., Mansor, N., & Adham, K. N. (2014). Perolehan Hijau Kerajaan: Garis Panduan Kepada Pegawai Perolehan Kerajaan (V1) (1st ed.). Kementerian Tenaga Teknologi Hijau dan Air (KeTTHA).

Kale, N. N., Joshi, D., & Menon, R. (2016). Life cycle cost analysis of commercial buildings with energy efficient approach. Perspectives in Science, 8, 452- 454.

KeTTHA. (2011). Low Carbon Cities Framework and Assessment System. Publisher: Kementerian Tenaga, Teknologi Hijau dan Air (KeTTHA), Malaysia Green Technology Corporation & Malaysian Institute of Planners.

Khan, J. S., Zakaria, R., Aminuddin, E., Abidin, N. I., Sahamir, S. R., Ahmad, R., & Abas, D. N. (2018). Web-based automation of green building rating index and life cycle cost analysis. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 143(1).

Kshirsagar, A. S., El-Gafy, M. a., & Abdelhamid, T. S. (2010). Suitability of life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) as asset management tools for institutional buildings. Journal of Facilities Management, 8(3), 162–178.

Marchi, B., & Zanoni, S. (2017). Supply chain management for improved energy efficiency: Review and opportunities. Energies, 10(10).

Maznan, N. A., Jaapar, A., Bari, N. A. A., & Zawawi, M. (2012). Value Management: Private Sector’s Perception. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 50(July), 383–391.

Mostavi, E., Asadi, S., & Boussaa, D. (2017). Development of a new methodology to optimize building life cycle cost, environmental impacts, and occupant satisfaction. Energy, 121(2017), 606–615.

Musa, N. D., Buniamin, S., Johari, N. H., Ahmad, N., Rauf, F. H. A., & Rashid, A. A. (2013). Key indicators towards the implementation of green government procurement in Malaysia. World Applied Sciences Journal, 28(13), 127–135.

Nikolaou, I.E., Loizou, C., (2015). The green public procurement in the midst of the economic crisis: is it a suitable policy tool? Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 12(1), 49–66.

Oduyemi, O., Okoroh, M. I., Fajana, O. S., & Arowosafe, O. (2018). The need for economic performance measures for life cycle costing of sustainable commercial office buildings. Journal of Facilities Management, 16(1), 54–64.

Pombo, O., Rivela, B., & Neila, J. (2016). The challenge of sustainable building renovation: Assessment of current criteria and future outlook. Journal of Cleaner Production, 123(March 2018), 88–100.

Preuss, L., & Walker, H., (2011). Psychological barriers in the road to sustainable development: evidence from public sector procurement. Public Administration, 89(2), 493–521.

Razali, N., Khalil, N., Bohari, A.A.M, & Husin, H.N. (2021). Green Procurement in Construction: Analysis of the Readiness Level and Key Catalyst Among Construction Enablers. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 12(1), pp.1-11

Shamsuddin, S. M., Zakaria, R., Hashim, N., & Mohamad Yusuwan, N. (2017). A Framework of Initiatives for Successful Application of Life Cycle Costing (LCC) in Industrialised Building System (IBS) in Malaysian Construction Industry. MATEC Web of Conferences, 138, 1–9.

Sun, K., & Hong, T. (2017). A Framework for Quantifying the Impact of Occupant Behavior on Energy Savings of Energy Conservation Measures. Energy and Buildings, 146, 383–396.

Testa, F., Annunziata, E., Iraldo, F., Frey, M., 2016a. Drawbacks and opportunities of green public procurement: an effective tool for sustainable production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112(3), 1893–1900.

UNEP (2013). Annual Report 2013 - United Nations Environment Programme. Publisher: United Nations

Weerasinghe, A. S., & Ramachandra, T. (2018). Economic sustainability of green buildings: a comparative analysis of green vs non-green. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 8(5), 528–543.

Wimala, M., Akmalah, E., & Sururi, M. R. (2016). Breaking through the Barriers to Green Building Movement in Indonesia: Insights from Building Occupants. Energy Procedia, 100(September),469–474.

Downloads

Published

2021-07-27

How to Cite

Khalil, N., Mohamad Bohari, A. A., Shamsudin, S. M., Abd Rashid, A. F., & Husin, H. N. (2021). KEY APPROACHES OF LIFE-CYCLE COST IN GREEN GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT (GGP) FOR GREEN PROJECTS. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 19(16). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v19i16.949