A FRAMEWORK OF CHALLENGES FACING THE SAFE CITY PROGRAMME IN KUALA LUMPUR

Authors

  • Seng Boon Lim School of Social, Development and Environmental Studies Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities UNIVERSITI KEBANGSAAN MALAYSIA
  • Chee Kong Yong PLANMalaysia (Federal Department of Town and Country Planning) MINISTRY OF TERRITORIES, MALAYSIA
  • Mohd Fadzil Abdul Rashid Department of Town & Regional Planning Faculty of Architecture, Planning & Surveying UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA (PERAK BRANCH)
  • Jalaluddin Abdul Malek School of Social, Development and Environmental Studies Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities UNIVERSITI KEBANGSAAN MALAYSIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v18i14.817

Keywords:

Crime-free city, crime prevention, sustainability and resilience challenges, safe cities, urban policy

Abstract

The Safe City Programme was launched one and a half-decade ago in Malaysia as one of the National Key Result Areas (NKRAs) strategy to curb crimes. However, the crime rates, in particular in Kuala Lumpur (KL), have shown little evidence of abating. Little is understood of the actual challenges facing the programme. Therefore, questions have been raised and many researchers are attracted to focus on this scenario. Thus, this study aimed to assess local players’ views of the challenges facing the safe city programme in KL and to provide a framework for the prevention strategies. The research involved qualitative in-depth interviews with key players in the area of safe city, crime experts and officials, and community heads. Themes and a framework were formulated through thematic analysis. The results showed that the understanding of a safe city programme could be differentiated through the lens of sustainability and resilience challenges, as well as their levels of prevention. Thus, the grey area of tertiary prevention strategies could be identified and strengthened.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Achour, N., Pantzartzis, E., Pascale, F., & Price, A. D. F. (2015). Integration of resilience and sustainability: From theory to application. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 6(3), 347–362.

Ahmad Nazrin, A. A., Siti Noorbaizura, B., & Noor Azah, A. (2012). The effectiveness of safe city programme as safety basic in tourism industry: Case study in Putrajaya. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 42, 477–485.

Baum, H. (2011). Planning and the problem of evil. Planning Theory, 10(2), 103–123.

Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588–608.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Dass, R. A. S. (2019). Crime trends and patterns in Malaysia. Kyoto Review of Southeast Asia, 25(Trendsletters). https://kyotoreview.org/trendsetters/crime-trends-and-patterns-in-malaysia/

Davidson, K., Nguyen, T. M. P., Beilin, R., & Briggs, J. (2019). The emerging addition of resilience as a component of sustainability in urban policy. Cities, 92, 1–9.

Dobovšek, B. (2009). Prevention of corruption in practice – Integrity plans. In G. Meško & H. Kury (Eds.), Crime Policy, Crime Control and Crime Prevention - Slovenian Perspectives (pp. 253–282). Ljubljana: Tipografija Publishing.

Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU). (2019). Safe Cities Index 2019. London: The Economist, Intelligent Unit.

Federal Department of Town and Country Planning (FDTCP). (n.d.). Program Bandar Selamat (PBS). Retrieved February 1, 2020, from https://www.townplan.gov.my/index.php/en/agensi/program-bandar-selamat

Federal Department of Town and Country Planning (FDTCP). (2006). Dasar Perbandaran Negara. Putrajaya: Ministry of Housing and Local Government Malaysia.

Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.

Jalaluddin, A. M., & Mohd Asruladlyi, I. (2015). Bandar selamat dan keselamatan komuniti bandar selamat. E-Bangi, 10(1), 97–117.

Kuala Lumpur City Hall (KLCH). (2004). Kuala Lumpur Structure Plan 2020. Kuala Lumpur: Kuala Lumpur City Hall.

Leach, M., Stirling, A. C., & Scoones, I. (2010). Dynamic Sustainabilities: Technology, Environment, Social Justice. London: Routledge.

Matland, R. E. (1995). Synthesizing the implementation literature: The ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5(2), 145–174.

Nor Eeda, A. (2006). Pembangunan Komuniti Dalam Pelaksanaan Konsep Bandar Selamat. Msc thesis, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

President of the United States. (2010). National Security Strategy. Washington: The White House.

Roostaie, S., Nawari, N., & Kibert, C. J. (2019). Sustainability and resilience: A review of definitions, relationships, and their integration into a combined building assessment framework. Building and Environment, 154, 132–144.

Royal Malaysia Police (RMP). (2017). Safe City Monitoring System (SCMS). Retrieved June 21, 2017, from the confidential online GIS crime-based data, Royal Malaysia Police.

Shuhana, S., Natasha Azim, H., & Nur Rasyiqah, A. H. (2013). Implementation of Safe City Program for a liveable city: The case of Kuala Lumpur. 3rd International Conference on Universal Design in the Built Environment, Putrajaya, 11th – 12th November, 355–373.

UN Habitat. (2017). New Urban Agenda. Quito: United Nations Habitat III.

Wilson, J. Q., & Kelling, G. (1982). Broken windows: The police and neighborhood safety. Atlantic Monthly, 249, 29–38.

Yong, C. K. (2019). The effectiveness of Safe City Program in reducing street crime and fear of crime from the perspective of pedestrian: Case study Kuala Lumpur. PhD thesis, Infrastructure University Kuala Lumpur.

Downloads

Published

2020-11-25

How to Cite

Lim, S. B., Yong, C. K., Abdul Rashid, M. F., & Abdul Malek, J. (2020). A FRAMEWORK OF CHALLENGES FACING THE SAFE CITY PROGRAMME IN KUALA LUMPUR. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 18(14). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v18i14.817

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>