CLASSIFICATIONS OF CLASSICAL MALAY ARISTOCRATIC ARCHITECTURE: IDENTIFYING GENERIC AND VARIANT FORMS

Authors

  • Tengku Anis Qarihah Raja Abdul Kadir Kulliyyah of Architecture and Environmental Design INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY MALAYSIA
  • Puteri Shireen Jahn Kassim Kulliyyah of Architecture and Environmental Design INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY MALAYSIA
  • Noor Hanita Abdul Majid Kulliyyah of Architecture and Environmental Design INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY MALAYSIA
  • Zumahiran Kamaruddin Kulliyyah of Architecture and Environmental Design INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY MALAYSIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v16i6.485

Keywords:

classical rules, regionalism, Malay identity, aristocratic form

Abstract

The paper reports on a basic classification based on formal and morphological similarities of large vernacular buildings across the Malay region, based on their frontages; with the aim of developing a universal regional language and set of rules of local architecture for urban and multi-storeys typologies. Generally, seen as idiosyncratic and individualistic, Malay regional palaces and mansions across different states and regions under former Sultanates, exhibit different vocabularies, yet have underlying similarities. While form and architecture may arise from the local technology and construction methods of the era, aesthetic expressions of these palaces recall formal archetypes which can be described, and characterised, regardless of location. Focusing on palaces in Malaysia and East Sumatran region from the late 1800s onwards, recurring forms of a Malay-Classical language are observed and classified into generic morphologies of frontages. The aim is towards formal taxonomy that can represent a more inclusive architectural identity of the region, rather than identities based on nations. By defining the ‘generic’ and the ‘variant’, significant palaces across the Malay region are discussed and positioned within a classification based on a range of generic archetypes. Variants include cases which have absorbed external influences yet retain the essences of local form, while some examples, refer to elements that have modernised been yet represent the last offshoot or branch of the same region. To identify generic rules and frameworks of design, the regional roots of form, including frontages, for public buildings is crucial for urbanscape and the urgency of developing guidelines and a set of compositional rules and language of urban architecture derived from the essences of tradition and past forms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abd Rashid, M. S., & Che Amat, S. (2009, July). The traditional Malay architecture: Between aesthetics and symbolism. Seminar on Intellectual Property and Heritage Issues in the Built Environment. July 20-21, 2009, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Amoroso, D. J. (2014). Traditionalism and the ascendancy of the Malay ruling class in Malaya. Singapore: Singapore University Press.

Andaya, L. Y. (2010). Leaves of the same tree – Trade and ethnicity in the Straits of Malacca. Singapore: NUS Press.

Clark, R. H., & Pause, M. (2012). Precedents in architecture: Analytic diagrams, formative ideas, and partis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Evers, B., Biermann, V., & Thoenes, C. (2003). Architectural theory: from the Renaissance to the present. Ko?ln: Taschen.

Fletcher, B. (1996). Sir Banister Fletcher's a History of Architecture. New York: Architectural Press.

Gullick, J. M. (1987). Malay society in the late nineteenth century: The beginnings of change. Singapore: Oxford University Press.

Hourigan, N. (2015). Confronting classifications - when and what is vernacular architecture? Civil Engineering and Architecture, 3(1), 22-30.

Ibrahim, M. (2017). The genius of tradition: Palatial classicism in the Malay world. In S. Jahn Kassim, N, Nawawi, & N. Abdul Majid (Eds.), The resilience of tradition, Malay allusions in contemporary architecture. Penang, Malaysia: Areca Publishers.

Jahn Kassim, S., Nawawi, N., & Abdul Majid, N. (2017). The resilience of tradition, Malay allusions in contemporary architecture. Penang, Malaysia: Areca Publishers.

Measured drawings and Heritage Studies. Kulliyah of Architecture and Environmental Design (KAED) IIUM.

Measured drawings. KALAM, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM).

Milner, A. C. (2011). The Malays. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

Mohamad Rasdi, M. T., Mohd. Ali, K., Syed Ariffin, S. A. I., Mursib, G., & Mohamad, R. (2005). The architectural heritage of the Malay World the traditional houses. Skudai, Johor: Penerbit UTM.

Nasir, A. H., & Wan Teh, W. H. (1997). Warisan senibina Melayu. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Porphyrios, D. (1982). Classicism is not a style (Volume 52). Michigan: Architectural Design.

Rae, M. (2017). Architecture and theology: The art of place. Waco, Texas: Baylor University Press.

Reid, A. (2004). Understanding Melayu (Malay) as a Source of Diverse Modern Identities. In Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 32(3), 295-313.

Shuaib, A. A., & Enoch, O. F. (2013). Application of Kelantan traditional aesthetic values into the architecture of contemporary homes. Arts and Design Studies, 6(15), 15-25.

Summerson, J. (1980). The classical language of architecture. London: Thames and Hudson.

Watkin, D. (2011). A history of Western architecture. London: Laurence King Publishing.

Wong, W. (1995). Timber structures in Malaysian architecture and buildings (Master thesis). University of Tasmania, Australia.

Downloads

Published

2018-09-12

How to Cite

Raja Abdul Kadir, T. A. Q., Jahn Kassim, P. S., Abdul Majid, N. H., & Kamaruddin, Z. (2018). CLASSIFICATIONS OF CLASSICAL MALAY ARISTOCRATIC ARCHITECTURE: IDENTIFYING GENERIC AND VARIANT FORMS. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 16(6). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v16i6.485

Most read articles by the same author(s)