THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEARNING SPACE ATTRIBUTES WITH STUDENTS' SATISFACTION AND PERCEIVED PERFORMANCE

Authors

  • Fadhlizil Fariz Abdul Munir Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Surveying UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA, MALAYSIA
  • Asniza Hamimi Abdul Tharim Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Surveying UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA, MALAYSIA
  • Thuraiya Mohd Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Surveying UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA, MALAYSIA
  • Suzana Said Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Surveying UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA, MALAYSIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v16i6.480

Keywords:

learning space, environment, design, facilities, satisfaction, performance

Abstract

The shift in the learning patterns of the current generation motivates the changes in the setting of learning spaces. This research objective is to examine the association between Learning Space attributes with student satisfaction and perceived performance. A survey was conducted in Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Perak Branch, Seri Iskandar Campus, Malaysia. A questionnaire was administered and collected from 410 students, where respondents were asked to select their preferences based on a five-point Likert scale of agreement and satisfaction. The analysis was conducted using PLS-SEM: Smart-PLS Version 3.2 to examine the measurement and structural model of the research. Results indicated that there is a significant relationship between Learning Space attributes with student satisfaction and perceived performance. The overall findings of this research show that the research variables successfully predicted the model.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdul Tharim, A. H., Abdul Samad, M. H., & Ismail, M. (2017). Relationship between indoor environmental quality (IEQ), occupant’s satisfaction and productivity in GBI rated office building using SEM-PLS. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 25S, 319-329.

Andreatos, A. (2007). Virtual communities and their importance for informal learning. International Journal of Computers, Communications & Control, 2(1), 39-47.

Barclay, D., Higgins, C., & Thompson, R. (1995). The Partial Least Squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology Study, 2(2), 285-309.

Bluyssen, P. M., Aries, M., & van Dommelen, P. (2011). Comfort of workers in office buildings: The European HOPE project. Building and Environment, 46, 280-288.

Cheung, M. K. & Lee, K. O. (2010). A Theoretical Model of Intentional Social Action in Online Social Networks. Decision Support Systems, 4(1), 24-30.

Choi, J. H., Aziz, A., & Loftness, V. (2009). Decision support for improving occupant environmental satisfaction in office buildings: The relationship between sub-set of IEQ satisfaction and overall environmental satisfaction.

Fister, B. (2009). The glorious study hall: how libraries nurture a life of the mind. Library Issues, 30(2), 1-4.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Barin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Pearson.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). London: Sage.

Hall, R. (2009). Towards a fusion of formal and informal learning environments: The impact of the read/write web. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 7(1), 29-40.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.

Higgins, S., Hall, E., Wall, K., Woolner, P., & McCaughey, C. (2005). The impact of school environments: A literature review. Newcastle: University of Newcastle.

Keep, G. D. (2002). Buildings that teach. Educational Facilities Planner, 37(2), 18-22.

Lackney, J. & Jacobs, P. (2002). Teachers as placemakers: Investigating teachers' use of the physical learning environment in instructional design.

Lehtinen, E. (1997), Verkkopedagogiikka. Helsinki: Edita.

Lomas, C. & Oblinger, D. (2006). Student practices and their impact on learning spaces. In D. Oblinger (Ed.), Learning spaces (pp. 5.1-5.11). Washington, DC: EDUCAUSE.

Malcolm, J., Hodkinson, P., & Colley, H. (2003). The interrelationships between informal and formal learning. Journal of Workplace Learning, 15(7/8), 313-318.

Marans, R.W. & Yan, X. (1989). Lighting quality and environmental satisfaction in open and enclosed offices. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 6, 118-131.

Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. E. (2001). Informal and incidental learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2001(89), 25-34.

Montgomery, T. (2008). Space matters: Experiences of managing static formal learning spaces. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9, 122-138.

Oblinger, D. (2006). Space as a change agent. In D. Oblinger (Ed.), Learning spaces (pp. 1.1-1.4). Washington, DC: EDUCAUSE.

Organ, D. W. (1977). A reappraisal and reinterpretation of the satisfaction-causes-performance hypothesis. The Academy of Management Review, 2(1), 46-53.

Schakib-Ekbatan, K., Wagner, A., & Lussac, C. (2010, April). Occupant satisfaction as an indicator for the socio-cultural dimension of sustainable office buildings - development of an overall building index. Adapting to Change: New Thinking on Comfort. April 9-11, 2010, Windsor, UK.

Schugurensky, D. (2000, October). The forms of informal learning: Towards a conceptualization of the field. New Approaches for Lifelong Learning (NALL) Fourth Annual Conference. October 6-8, 2000. http://hdl.handle.net/1807/2733.

Schwab, D. P. & Cummings, L. L. (1970). Theories of performance and satisfaction: A review. Industrial Relations, 9(4):408-30

Sekaran, U. & Bougie, R. 2013. Research methods for business: A skill- building approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc

Temple, P. (2007). Learning spaces for the 21st century: A review of the literature. London: University of London.

Veitch, J. A., Charles, K. E., Farley, K. M. J., & Newsham, G. R. (2007). A model of satisfaction with open-plan office conditions: COPE field findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 177-189

Whiteside, A., Brooks, D. C., & Walker, J. D. (2010). Making the case for space: Three years of empirical research on learning environments. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/making-case-space-three-years-empirical-research-learning-environments

Zagreus, L., Huizenga, C., Arens, E. A., & Lehrer, D. (2004). Listening to the occupants: A web-based indoor environmental quality survey. Indoor Air, 14(Suppl. 8), 65-74.

Downloads

Published

2018-09-12

How to Cite

Abdul Munir, F. F., Abdul Tharim, A. H., Mohd, T., & Said, S. (2018). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEARNING SPACE ATTRIBUTES WITH STUDENTS’ SATISFACTION AND PERCEIVED PERFORMANCE. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 16(6). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v16i6.480