MEDIATION EFFECT OF SOCIAL ASPECT IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECONOMIC ASPECTS: THEIR INFLUENCE ON THE VALUE OF GREEN COMMERCIAL OFFICE PROPERTY

Authors

  • Tuti Haryati Jasimin Razak School of Engineering and Advanced Technology UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v16i5.429

Keywords:

Sustainability aspects, green commercial office building, Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) AMOS, valuation

Abstract

The potential value of green buildings is generally attributed to attractiveness for occupiers due to the environmental aspect which brings an impact to the social action, which eventually influences the economic aspect. These three aspects of sustainability (environment, social and economic), which adopted from Concentric Ring model contained various attributes. These attributes may or may not have significant influence among them, thus act as an indicator in impacting the green commercial office building’s value. Accordingly, it is substantial to identify which attributes of green commercial office property have significant relationship of sustainability and to what level of influence among them, including the role of social aspect as a mediator between environment and economic aspects of sustainability. In order to analyse the hypothesized relationships, this study collects quantitative data from the property holders and also end users (tenants and owner-users) of green commercial office building, as they experience the benefits of sustainability in the building. Data were analysed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) with IBM SPSS Statistics 20.0 and AMOS 19.0, respectively. The results show that all hypothesized relationships between environmental, social and economic aspects were supported and indicated significant relationships among them, hence become a fundamental of green commercial office property valuation framework development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Addae-dapaah, K., Hiang, L. K., & Yen, N. (2009). Sustainability of sustainable real property development. Journal of Sustainable Real Estate, 7(1), 203-225.

Ang, S. L., & Wilkinson, S. J. (2008). Is the social agenda driving sustainable property development in Melbourne, Australia? Property Management, 26(5), 331-343.

Babawale, G. K., & Oyalowo, B. A. (2011). Incorporating sustainability into real estate valuation: The perception of Nigerian valuers. Journal of Sustainable Development, 4(4), 236-249.

Blundell, L. (2010). Sustainability survives the GFC. Property Australia, 25(4), 44-46.

Bowman, R., & Wills, J. (2008). Valuing green: How green buildings affect property values and getting the valuation method right. Green Building Council of Australia.

Boyd, T. (2005). Can we assess the worth of environmental and social characteristics in investment property? Retrieved from http://prres.net/Papers/Boyd_Assess_Environmental_Social_Characteristics_ Investment_Property.pdf

Brandon, S. (2009). High performance green building: What’s it worth? Investigating the market value of high performance green buildings. Retrieved from https://living-future.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/High_Performance_Green_Building.pdf

Charles, K. E., Danforth, A. J., Veitch, J. A., Zwierzchowski, C., Johnson, B., & Pero, K. (2004). Workstation design for organizational productivity. National Research Council Canada; Public Works and Government Services Canad

Davies, R. (2010). Green value - Green buildings, growing assets - A major collaboration into the study of building value by building green. Retrieved from https://www.hatchdesign.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/greenvaluereport1 .pdf

Fisk, W. J. (2000). Health and productivity gains from better indoor environments and their relationship with building energy efficiency. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 25(1), 537-66.

Hemphill, L., Mcgreal, S., & Berry, J. (2002). An aggregated weighting system for evaluating sustainable urban regeneration. Journal of Property Research, 19(4), 353-373.

Heerwagen, J. H. (2000). Green buildings, organizational success, and occupant productivity. Building Research & Information, 28(5), 353-367.

Kats, G., Alevantis, L., Berman, A., Mills, E., & Perlman, J. (2003). The costs and financial benefits of green buildings. A report to California’s Sustainable Building Task Force. Sustainable Building Task Force.

Kampschroer, K., & Heerwagen, J. H. (2005). The strategic workplace: Development and evaluation. Building Research & Information, 55(4), 326-37.

Kumar, S., & Fisk, W. (2002). The role of emerging energy-efficient technology in promoting workplace productivity and health: Final report. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0sw558qr

Lorenz, D., & Lutzkendorf, T. (2008). Sustainability in property valuation: Theory and practice. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 26(6), 482-521.

Lutzkendorf, T., & Lorenz, D. (2011). Capturing sustainability-related information for property valuation. Building Research & Information, 39(3), 256-273.

Lojuntin, S. A. (2014). Green construction industry; national and global challenges.

MD Darus, Z., & Hashim, N. A. (2012). Sustainable building in Malaysia: The development of sustainable building rating system. In C. Ghenai (Ed.), Sustainable development - Education, business and management - Architecture and building construction - Agriculture andfood security (pp. 113-144). InTech. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/sustainable-developmenteducation-business-and-management-architecture-and-building-construction-agriculture-and-foodsecurity/sustainable-building-in-malaysia-the-development-of-sustainable-building-rating-system

Miller, E., & Buys, L. (2008). Retrofitting commercial office buildings for sustainability: Tenants’ perspectives. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 26(6), 552561.

Miller, N., Pogue, D., Gough, Q., & Davis, S. (2009) Green buildings and productivity. Journal of Sustainable Real Estate, 1(1), 65-89.

Myers, G., Reed, R., & Robinson, J. (2007, January). The relationship between sustainability and the value of office buildings. In 13th Annual Pacific Rim Real Estate Conference, January 21-24, 2007, Fremantle, Western Australia.

Rahman, R. (2011, April 30). A green look at property value. The Star.

Reed, R. G., & Wilkinson, S. J. (2005). The increasing importance of sustainability for building ownership. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 7(4), 339-350.

RICS. (2005). Green value.

RICS. (2009). Sustainability and commercial property valuation. Westwood Business Park, London.

Robinson, J. (2005). Property valuation and analysis applied to environmentally sustainable development. Retrieved from http://cavrep.com.au/E7ENVIRONMENTALLY%20SUSTAINABLE%20 DEVELOPMENT%20-%20VALUATION.pdf

Runde, T. P., & Thoyre, S. (2010). Integrating sustainability and green building into the appraisal process. Journal of Sustainable Real Estate, 2(1), 221-248.

Samari, M., Ghodrati, N., Esmaeilifar, R., Olfat, P., & Mohd Shafiei, M. W. (2013). The investigation of the barriers in developing green building in Malaysia. Modern Applied Science, 7(2), 1-10.

Sayce, S., & Ellison, L. (2003, August) Integrating sustainability into the appraisal of property worth: Identifying appropriate indicators of sustainability. In AREUEA conference, August 21-23, Skye, Scotland.

Sayce, S., Sundberg, A., & Clements, B. (2010). Is sustainability reflected in commercial property prices: an analysis of the evidence base. London: RICS.

Schumann, B. (2010). Impact of sustainability on property values (Master’s thesis). University of Regensburg.

Ting, K. H. (2012, April). Tropical green building rating systems: A comparison between Green Building Index and BCA Green Mark. In 2012 IEEE Business, Engineering & Industrial Applications Colloquium (BEIAC), April 7-8, 2012, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Tuti, H. J. (2016). A model structure of sustainability aspects for green commercial office property valuation (Doctorate thesis). Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Wan Ismail, W. N., & Abdul Majid, R. (2014, April). The impact of green features on property valuation procedure. In International Real Estate Research Symposium, April 29-30, 2014, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Wargocki, P., Wyon, D. P., Baik, Y. K., Clausen, G., & Fanger, P. O. (2004). Perceived air quality, sick building syndrome (sbs) symptoms and productivity in an office with two different pollution loads. Indoor Air 9(3), 165-179.

World Green Building Council. (2013). The business case for green building.

Zainudin, A. (2015). SEM made simple: A gentle approach to learning structural equation modelling. MPWS Rich Publication.

Downloads

Published

2018-07-25

How to Cite

Jasimin, T. H. (2018). MEDIATION EFFECT OF SOCIAL ASPECT IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECONOMIC ASPECTS: THEIR INFLUENCE ON THE VALUE OF GREEN COMMERCIAL OFFICE PROPERTY. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 16(5). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v16i5.429