INTRA-URBAN DISTANCE VARIATIONS IN PERCEIVED 20-MINUTE NEIGHBOURHOOD FEATURES: A KRUSKAL-WALLIS ANALYSIS WITHIN AN 800m WALKABLE CATCHMENT IN BAYAN BARU, PENANG, MALAYSIA

Authors

  • Siti Noorhawa Azyze Ellah Azyze UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA
  • Diana Mohamad UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA
  • Ruhizal Roosli UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v24i43.2083

Keywords:

20-minute neighbourhood, Walkability, Age Factors, Intra-Urban Distance, Perceived Accessibility, Kruskal-Wallis Analysis

Abstract

The 20-Minute Neighbourhood (20MN) has emerged as a prominent urban planning framework aimed at promoting accessibility, sustainability and local living. However, its application often assumes a uniform walking threshold, potentially overlooking variations in mobility needs, environmental perceptions, and demographic characteristics. This study examines how perceived neighbourhood performance varies across age groups and distance bands within an 800 m walkable catchment in a compact urban context. Using questionnaire data and non-parametric statistical analysis, the study evaluates six 20MN domains: safe, accessible and connected mobility; local economy and daily needs; essential services and community destinations; climate resilience and environmental comfort; high-quality public realm and open spaces; and housing diversity and affordability. Kruskal–Wallis tests identify significant differences in perceived neighbourhood features across distance bands, while age-group comparisons show limited variation across the six domains. The findings indicate that spatial proximity plays a stronger role than age in shaping perceived 20MN performance within the study area, although demographic characteristics remain relevant for inclusive neighbourhood planning. This study contributes to context-sensitive 20MN planning by highlighting the importance of considering intra-neighbourhood spatial variations when evaluating accessibility and neighbourhood quality in compact tropical urban environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Calafiore, A., Liton, K., & Smith, P. (2022). Typologies of 20 Minute Neighbourhoods, active transport use, and spatial spillovers. Findings. https://doi.org/10.32866/001c.33158

Chau, H. W., Gilzean, I., Jamei, E., Palmer, L., Preece, T., & Quirke, M. (2022). Comparative analysis of 20 minute neighbourhood policies and practices in Melbourne and Scotland. Urban Planning, 7(4), 13–24.

Handley, J., et al. (2023). Age and the 20 min city: Accounting for variation in mobility. Applied Geography, 156, 103005.

Iqbal, A. (2025). Exploring the 15 minutes city concept: Global challenges for sustainable urban planning. Cities, 9(7), 252.

Littlejohn, J., Stevenson, A., Mitchell, R., & Stokes, J. (2024). How could 20 minute neighbourhoods impact health and health inequalities: A policy scoping review. Health & Place, 76, 102872.

Thornton, L. E., Schroers, R. D., Lamb, K. E., et al. (2022). Operationalising the 20 minute neighbourhood. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 19(15).

Fastl, C. (2024). Health impacts of heat on older people in urban and rural environments. Wiener klinische Wochenschrift. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-024-02419-0

Lönn, J. (2025). Older adults’ preferences and behaviour during warm weather and heatwaves: Urban environment and socio demographic influences. Cities, 166, 106260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2025.106260

Núñez Rodríguez, S., et al. (2025). Heat tolerance in older adults: Physiological vulnerability and thermoregulation. PMC Biology Review. (Systematic review synopsis).

Sánchez González, D. (2025). Pedestrian mobility behaviours of older adults during heat waves: Evidence from Madrid. Urban Science, 9(7), 236. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci9070236

Tan, T. Z. (2025). Walking under extreme heat: Considering pedestrian thermal comfort in hot humid climates. 12th Int. Conf. on Urban Climate (ICUC12). https://doi.org/10.5194/icuc12-1075

Xiong, K., et al. (2025). Cool walkable and cyclable community planning for heat vulnerable older adults. Journal of Urban Mobility Research.

Eiselen, R. (2023). A comparison of statistical tests for Likert type data. Journal of Open Humanities Data, 9, Article 18. https://doi.org/10.5334/johd.132

Karsokiene, R., et al. (2025). Visitor perceptions toward sustainable and resilient service quality across sectors: Kruskal–Wallis analysis of ordinal survey data. MDPI Sustainability Journal, 6(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6010031

Roslan, N., Marzbali, M. H., Abdullah, A., & Maghsoodi Tilaki, M. J. (2025). GIS ANALYSIS OF NEIGHBOURHOOD ENVIRONMENT DETERMINANTS THAT INFLUENCE WALKABILITY IN PENANG, MALAYSIA. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 23(35). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v23i35.1675

Roosli, R., Isa, M. I., Mohamad, D., & Othman, A. G. (2022). CRITERIA AND ATTRIBUTES FOR THE 20-MINUTE CITY CONCEPT (KP20M) IN BALIK PULAU, PULAU PINANG. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 20(24). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v20i24.1200

Rustin, S. N., & Arifin, S. (2026). A review of Kruskal–Wallis test applications in scientific research. Journal of Actuarial, Finance and Risk Management, 4(2). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/399664115

Downloads

Published

2026-08-09

How to Cite

Azyze Ellah Azyze, S. N., Mohamad , D., & Roosli, R. (2026). INTRA-URBAN DISTANCE VARIATIONS IN PERCEIVED 20-MINUTE NEIGHBOURHOOD FEATURES: A KRUSKAL-WALLIS ANALYSIS WITHIN AN 800m WALKABLE CATCHMENT IN BAYAN BARU, PENANG, MALAYSIA. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 24(43). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v24i43.2083

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 > >>