READINESS ASSESSMENT OF TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) CORRIDORS IN MALANG CITY, INDONESIA: A GIS-BASED EVALUATION OF ACCESSIBILITY AND LAND-USE INTEGRATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v24i42.2062Keywords:
Transit-Oriented Development (TOD), GIS, Land-use Integration, Accessibility, Urban Corridors, Medium-Sized Cities, TOD Readiness IndexAbstract
The increasing mobility demand in Indonesian secondary cities highlights the need for spatial integration between transport infrastructure and land-use planning. This study aims to assess the readiness of Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) corridors in Malang City, Indonesia, using a GIS-based multi-criteria evaluation of accessibility and land-use integration. The study adopts the 5D+I framework: Density, Diversity, Design, Destination Accessibility, Distance to Transit, and Intermodality, to measure the spatial relationship between urban form and transport connectivity. Spatial data were obtained from the Laporan Umum Tim PKL Kota Malang 2024, complemented by field surveys, land-use maps, and transport network datasets. Each indicator was analyzed and normalized using GIS-based overlay and buffer analysis to generate a composite TOD Readiness Index (TRI). The results reveal that the Kota Baru–Soekarno Hatta–Tlogomas corridor exhibits the highest readiness level (TRI = 0.81), supported by high density, mixed land use, and multimodal accessibility. The Blimbing–Arjosari corridor shows moderate readiness, while peripheral areas remain less prepared due to low density and limited transit coverage. Findings indicate that accessibility and land-use diversity are strongly correlated (r = 0.72), suggesting that integrated planning enhances urban connectivity and supports sustainable mobility. Policy implications include the need for institutional coordination, pedestrian network improvements, and zoning adjustments to encourage compact mixed-use development around transit nodes. This study contributes a replicable GIS-based framework for evaluating TOD readiness in medium-sized Indonesian cities, bridging the gap between spatial analysis and practical urban planning.
Downloads
References
Ainul Ashiqin, A. S., Osman, M. M., Rabe, N. S., Alhabshi, S. M. S. K., & Aripin, D. (2022). Enforcements and offences under the Strata Management Act. Planning Malaysia, 20(3), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v20i3.1078
Cervero, R., & Kockelman, K. (1997). Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2(3), 199–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6
Cervero, R., & Murakami, J. (2009). Rail and property development in Hong Kong: Experiences and extensions. Urban Studies, 46(10), 2019–2043. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009339431
Curtis, C., Renne, J., & Bertolini, L. (2016). Transit-oriented development: Making it happen. Routledge.
Curtis, C., & Scheurer, J. (2021). Performance measurement frameworks for strategic urban transport and land use planning. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 14(1), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2021.1833
Ewing, R., & Cervero, R. (2010). Travel and the built environment: A meta-analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(3), 265–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944361003766766
Ewing, R., & Handy, S. (2009). Measuring the built environment and its relationship to travel behavior. Journal of the American Planning Association, 75(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360802598436
Irfan, M., Wibowo, S., & Rahmawati, R. (2021). Evaluating transit-oriented development readiness in Jakarta Metropolitan Area using GIS. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 880(1), 012045. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/880/1/012045
Kamal, R., & Osman, M. M. (2022). Assessing the effectiveness of transit-oriented development policies in Kuala Lumpur Metropolitan Area. Planning Malaysia, 20(4), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v20i4.1154
Kumar, R., Kim, S., & Yai, T. (2020). Evaluating transit-oriented development in Bangkok using accessibility-based indicators. Journal of Transport Geography, 88, 102828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102828
Renne, J. (2018). Measuring the success of transit-oriented development: A performance-based approach. Transportation Research Record, 2672(8), 808–818. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118773556
Suzuki, H., Cervero, R., & Iuchi, K. (2013). Transforming cities with transit: Transit and land-use integration for sustainable urban development. World Bank.
Vale, D. S. (2015). Transit-oriented development, integration of land use and transport, and pedestrian accessibility: Combining the node-place model with pedestrian shed ratio to evaluate and classify station areas in Lisbon. Journal of Transport Geography, 45, 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.04.009
Wibowo, S., Prasetyo, D., & Wijaya, H. (2022). Challenges of implementing transit-oriented development in Indonesian cities. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, 9(2), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.11113/ijbes.v9.n2.856
Yoon, S. Y., Lee, S., & Choi, Y. (2019). Compact city policies and sustainable urban form: A case study of Seoul. Sustainability, 11(17), 4701. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174701
Zhao, P., Zhang, Y., & Kwan, M.-P. (2020). TOD in Asian cities: A comparative study of urban form and mobility. Cities, 96, 102439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102439
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright & Creative Commons Licence
eISSN: 0128-0945 © Year. The Authors. Published for Malaysian Institute of Planners. This is an open-access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
The authors hold the copyright without restrictions and also retain publishing rights without restrictions.
