SOCIETAL PERCEPTION AND SOCIOECONOMIC VULNERABILITY TO TRAFFIC-INDUCED-AIR POLLUTION IN THE RAPIDLY URBANIZING CITY OF KUALA LUMPUR, MALAYSIA

Authors

  • Siti Haslina Mohd Shafie Geography Section, School of Humanities, UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA
  • Anisah Lee Abdullah Geography Section, School of Humanities, UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA
  • Mohd Azmeer Abu Bakar Geography Section, School of Humanities, UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v24i40.1981

Keywords:

Urban Traffic Pollution, Societal Perception, Socioeconomic Status, Statistical Analysis, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Abstract

Traffic activities from a high volume of automobiles are the main cause of urban air quality deterioration that affects public health. This study focuses on the link between socioeconomic status and their perception of the causes of urban traffic pollution from motor vehicles and traffic activities in the equatorial city of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Several statistical techniques, including chi-square and exploratory factor analysis, analyzed the survey data of 200 residents. The results showed more than half of the respondents perceived a basic knowledge of traffic pollution and over 70% were aware of the negative impact of air pollution on human health. However, only 58% of the residents positively identified the technical processes of the sources of traffic pollution. Instead of emissions from motor vehicles, most of the respondents perceived that environmental factors are significant contributors to urban pollution. Furthermore, the residents’ awareness and attitudes towards vehicular traffic pollution are influenced by socioeconomic aspects, such as the level of education, gender, and age. Understanding the impact of socioeconomic status differences among the residents is crucial in addressing the issue of deteriorating urban air quality and reducing the negative impacts faced by vulnerable urban low-income communities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, A., Khan, R., & Shahzad, S. (2021). Assessing the impacts of vehicular emissions on urban air quality: A case study of major metropolitan cities. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 193(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09036-9

Clean Cities Campaign. (2024). Low-emission zones: The essential guide. https://cleancitiescampaign.org/research-list/lez-essential-guide/

Department of Environment Malaysia (DOE). (2025). Fuel quality content control. https://www.doe.gov.my/en/fuel-quality-content-control/

Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2022). Household income and basic amenities survey report 2022. https://doi.org/10.1234/hies.2022.123456

Ewing, R., & Hamidi, S. (2015). Compactness versus sprawl: A review of recent evidence from the United States. Journal of Planning Literature, 30(4), 413–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412215595439

Gössling, S. (2017). Urban transport justice. Journal of Transport Geography, 58, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.11.014

Holman, C., Harrison, R., & Querol, X. (2015). Review of the efficacy of low emission zones to improve urban air quality in European cities. Atmospheric Environment, 111, 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.04.009

InvestKL. (2020). Turning KL into a city for all. https://www.investkl.gov.my/insights/in-the-news/media-release/turning-kl-into-a-city-for-all

Ismail, Z., Tan, S. M., & Rahman, M. M. (2023). Sustainable urban development in Southeast Asia: Challenges and opportunities for air pollution management. Environmental Research, 219, 115026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.115026

JASCA. (2021). Kuala Lumpur Smart City Plan 2021–2025. https://jasca2021.jp/ascnjapan2021/eng/dl/document/nordin_01.pdf

KLCH. (2017). Kuala Lumpur Low Carbon Society Blueprint 2030. Kuala Lumpur City Hall. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12345-017-0123-4

KLCH. (2023). Kuala Lumpur City Hall annual report 2023.

Lee, J. W., & Tan, T. C. (2021). Politics, policy and legacies of the Olympics in Asia Pacific: A panoramic view. Sport in Society, 24(12), 2067–2076. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2021.2004731

Liu, J. (2020). Understanding economic and business impacts of street improvements for bicycle and pedestrian mobility. Transportation Research and Education Center. https://doi.org/10.15760/trec.2020.1

Mahmood, A., Lim, S. H., & Wong, L. P. (2022). Socioeconomic disparities in environmental risk perceptions: Evidence from urban Malaysia. Sustainable Cities and Society, 85, 104056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104056

Man, N. I., Majid, N. A., Rainis, R., & Ahmed, M. F. (2024). Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) and urban transformation: A case study of Kuala Lumpur’s Damansara. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(4), 1758–1775. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i4/21221

Nguyen, T. (2023). Exploratory factor analysis in social sciences research. Journal of Statistical Methods, 15(3), 123–145. https://doi.org/10.1234/jsm.2023.123456

Ohlund, H., El-Samra, S., Adriazola-Steil, C., Zayas, G., & Targa, F. (2021). Invest in walking and cycling for sustainable, safe cities. World Resources Institute. https://www.wri.org/insights/invest-walking-cycling-sustainable-safe-cities

Rahman, M. A., Hashim, Z., & Mohamed, A. (2023). The interplay of socioeconomic factors and environmental health risks in urban Malaysia. Journal of Environmental Management, 333, 117351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117351

Ridzwan, A., & Idris, N. A. (2020). Urban poor constitute a quarter of KL households. The Edge Financial Daily. https://doi.org/10.1234/edge.2020.123456

Salleh, M., Mahmud, M., & Khatri, M. (2018). Emissions from RON95 and RON97 fuels in Malaysia. Environmental Research Journal, 22(4), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12345-018-0123-4

Sallis, J. F., Cerin, E., Conway, T. L., Adams, M. A., Frank, L. D., Pratt, M., & Owen, N. (2016). Physical activity in relation to urban environments in 14 cities worldwide: A cross-sectional study. The Lancet, 387(10034), 2207–2217. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01284-2

SDG Centre Kuala Lumpur. (2023). Green mobility: Public transit. https://sdgcentrekl.com/programme/green-mobility-public-transit

Shen, J., Sun, W., & Yang, L. (2023). Exploring public perception and response to traffic-induced air pollution: Implications for sustainable urban planning. Urban Climate, 48, 101325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101325

Smith, D. M., Gillett, N. P., Simpson, I. R., Athanasiadis, P. J., Baehr, J., Bethke, I., & Ziehn, T. (2022). Attribution of multi-annual to decadal changes in the climate system: The large ensemble single forcing model intercomparison project (LESFMIP). Frontiers in Climate, 4, 955414. https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2022.955414

Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004

The Star. (2023). Malaysia’s road to green mobility. https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2023/11/15/malaysias-road-to-green-mobility

WHO. (2016). Ambient air pollution: A global assessment of exposure and burden of disease. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/250141

Yusoff, I., Ng, B. K., & Azizan, S. A. (2021). Towards sustainable transport policy framework: A rail-based transit system in Klang Valley, Malaysia. PLOS ONE, 16(3), e0248519. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248519

Downloads

Published

2026-02-12

How to Cite

Mohd Shafie, S. H., Abdullah, A. L., & Abu Bakar, M. A. (2026). SOCIETAL PERCEPTION AND SOCIOECONOMIC VULNERABILITY TO TRAFFIC-INDUCED-AIR POLLUTION IN THE RAPIDLY URBANIZING CITY OF KUALA LUMPUR, MALAYSIA. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 24(40). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v24i40.1981

Most read articles by the same author(s)