THE IMPACT OF BIOPHILIC DESIGN ON RESIDENT WELL-BEING IN MALAYSIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v23i39.1930Keywords:
Biophilic Design, Low-Cost Housing, Resident Knowledge, Sustainable Development Goal (SDG), Urban Well-beingAbstract
Biophilic design that integrates natural elements into the built environment is recognized to enhance human well-being and support sustainable development. However, the application of biophilic principles in low-cost housing in Malaysia is still limited, due to financial constraints and a lack of awareness and understanding among residents and stakeholders. This study aims to investigate the key factors of biophilic design in low-cost housing projects in Malaysia, focusing on the level of knowledge and awareness of residents. The study also assesses the potential impact of these design elements on the well-being of residents and their contribution to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly in the aspects of health and sustainable communities. A quantitative approach was used through a structured questionnaire distributed online (Google Form). The survey involved residents of public housing projects such as PPR in Negeri Sembilan and Melaka and PPAM in Putrajaya. The 229 Google Form was analyzed to assess the level of awareness, identify valued design factors, and understand perceptions of the benefits of biophilic design. The study findings show that although residents appreciate natural elements in residential spaces, the level of awareness of biophilic design principles is still low. This study highlights the importance of integrating biophilic elements into low-cost housing designs to improve residents' well-being and support environmental sustainability. This study also suggests the need for educational and policy programs to raise awareness and encourage the adoption of biophilic design in future housing developments. Further research is recommended involving larger sample sizes and expert perspectives for a more comprehensive understanding.
Downloads
References
Adetola Adewale Akinsulire, Courage Idemudia, Azubuike Chukwudi Okwandu, & Obinna Iwuanyanwu. (2024). Sustainable development in affordable housing: Policy innovations and challenges. Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews, 11(2), 090–104. https://doi.org/10.30574/MSARR.2024.11.2.0112
Agarwal, S., Mandal, S., Bajaj, D., Agarwal, A. S., & Singh, T. P. (2021). Affordable Housing and its Sustainability-A review of Critical Success Factors (CSFs). 2021 9th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions), ICRITO 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRITO51393.2021.9596156
Ahmed, A. N., & Shukur, S. M. (2022). Biophilic Design Patterns Implementation in Houses A Case Study of Residential Villages in Erbil City. Eurasian Journal of Science and Engineering, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.23918/eajse.v8i1p1
Al-Haroun, Y. A. M. (2021). Designing a sustainable house in Kuwait. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2021.090405
Alvarsson, J. J., Wiens, S., & Nilsson, M. E. (2010). Stress recovery during exposure to nature sound and environmental noise. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph7031036
Amerio, A., Brambilla, A., Morganti, A., Aguglia, A., Bianchi, D., Santi, F., Costantini, L., Odone, A., Costanza, A., Signorelli, C., Serafini, G., Amore, M., & Capolongo, S. (2020). Covid-19 lockdown: Housing built environment’s effects on mental health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165973
Bahauddin, A., Prihantmanti, R., & Ong, J. (2021). Biophilic design patterns and local knowledge of plants application in Baba-Nyonya heritage shophouses’ courtyard. ARTEKS: Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v6i2.757
Birkeland, J. (2018). Challenging policy barriers in sustainable urban design. Bulletin of Geography, 40(40). https://doi.org/10.2478/bog-2018-0013
Browning, W., Ryan, C., & Clancy, J. (2014). 14 Patterns of Biophilic Design: Improving Health & Well-Being in the Built Environment. Terrapin Bright Green, LLC. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2008.04.024
Cohen, B., Cowie, A., Babiker, M., Leip, A., & Smith, P. (2021). Co-benefits and trade-offs of climate change mitigation actions and the Sustainable Development Goals. In Sustainable Production and Consumption (Vol. 26). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.034
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Quaitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches (Fifth Edition). In Research Defign: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed M ethods Approaches.
D’alessandro, D., Gola, M., Appolloni, L., Dettori, M., Fara, G. M., Rebecchi, A., Settimo, G., & Capolongo, S. (2020). COVID-19 and living space challenge. Well-being and public health recommendations for a healthy, safe, and sustainable housing. Acta Biomedica, 91. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i9-S.10115
Durdyev, S., & Tokbolat, S. (2022). A quantified model for assessment of drivers of acquiring green buildings by potential clients. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01589-5
Durusoy, E., & Mutuş, R. (2021). Yeşil Egzersizin Kronik Ağrıya, Fiziksel ve Mental Sağlığa Etkileri. İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:239698616
Eker, S., Zimmermann, N., Carnohan, S., & Davies, M. (2018). Participatory system dynamics modelling for housing, energy and wellbeing interactions. Building Research and Information, 46(7). https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2017.1362919
Hasan, A., Elmualim, A., Rameezdeen, R., & Baroudi, B. (2018). Housing Affordability in India: Opportunities and Key Challenges. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482025.048
Ibrahim, I. A., & Al-Chaderchi, B. M. (2022). CONTRIBUTION OF THE BIOPHILIC DESIGN APPROACH TO THE UN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS. WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, 210. https://doi.org/10.2495/ARC220101
Ismail, S., Choong Weng Wai, C., Abdul Hamid, H., Mustapha, N. F., Ho, G., Theng Theng, T., Kamarzuki, M. N., & Mohamed Firouz, A. M. (2019). Agenda Perumahan: Peranan Kerajaan, Pasaran dan Masyarakat: Sebuah Laporan Khas Bagi Penggubalan Dasar Perumahan Negara (2018-2025). moz-extension://d32a7377-7409-4fa4-ac5e-114cf75d2152/enhanced-reader.html?openApp&pdf=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.krinstitute.org%2Fassets%2FcontentMS%2Fimg%2Ftemplate%2Feditor%2FPemerkasaan%2520Agenda%2520Perumahan%2520(Full%2520Report)%2520-%2520BM%2520Version.pdf
Jamelle, H. (2021). Inclusionary housing and innovative reuse. In Under Pressure: Essays on Urban Housing. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003038375-23
Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: a psychological perspective. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective.
Kellert, S. R. (2008). Dimensions, Elements, and Attributes of Biophilic Design. In Biophilic Design: The Theory, Science and Practice of Bringing Buildings to Life.
Kellert, S. R. (2018). Nature by design: The practice of biophilic design. In Nature by Design: The Practice of Biophilic Design.
Kellert, S. R., & Calabrese, E. F. (2015). The Practice of Biophilic Design. In Biophilic-Design.Com.
Lohr, V. I., Pearson-Mims, C. H., & Goodwin, G. K. (1996). Interior Plants May Improve Worker Productivity and Reduce Stress in a Windowless Environment. Journal of Environmental Horticulture, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.24266/0738-2898-14.2.97
Merenkov, A. V., Akchurina, N. S., & Matveeva, T. M. (2019). Basic principles of “green” architecture in foreign realization experience. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 687(5). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/687/5/055058
Mohd Thas Thaker, H., & Ariff, M. (2020). Supply-side drivers of residential price in Malaysia: a qualitative analysis from developers’ perspectives. Property Management, 38(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/PM-10-2019-0056
Mouratidis, K. (2021). Urban planning and quality of life: A review of pathways linking the built environment to subjective well-being. Cities, 115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103229
O, U. A., B, E. J., C, M. O., P, U. C., & N, A. T. (2023). Bio-Inspired Architecture for Energy-Efficient Homes: Blending Nature and Innovation. Journal of Energy Engineering and Thermodynamics. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:265600315
Perdana, J., Jabatan, M., & Malaysia, P. (n.d.). JABATAN PERANGKAAN MALAYSIA DEPARTMENT OF STATISTICS MALAYSIA PENEMUAN UTAMA BANCI PENDUDUK DAN PERUMAHAN MALAYSIA KEY FINDINGS POPULATION AND HOUSING CENSUS OF MALAYSIA. https://www.dosm.gov.my
Pouso, S., Borja, Á., Fleming, L. E., Gómez-Baggethun, E., White, M. P., & Uyarra, M. C. (2021). Contact with blue-green spaces during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown beneficial for mental health. Science of the Total Environment, 756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143984
Sabar, R., Anuar, N. K., Mutazam, M., Nifa, F. A. A., & Lin, C. K. (2018). Awareness of green building design in Malaysia. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5055528
Salim, A. M., & Alabdouli, S. H. (2022). Application of Quality Function Deployment Method to Design Affordable Houses in the United Arab Emirates. 2022 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences, ASET 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/ASET53988.2022.9734906
Shakhshir, K., & Sheta, W. (2023). The assessment of biophilic features in residential buildings: a case from Dubai. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-03-2023-0064
Sharif Bala, H., Li, B., Yusuf, D., & Du, C. (2023). BIOPHILIC NET-POSITIVE ARCHITECTURE ESPOUSES PASSIVE DESIGN STRATEGIES FOR A HEALTHY SUSTAINABLE BUILT ENVIRONMENT: OVERVIEW.
Singh, A., Daniel, L., Baker, E., & Bentley, R. (2019). Housing Disadvantage and Poor Mental Health: A Systematic Review. In American Journal of Preventive Medicine (Vol. 57, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2019.03.018
Syed Jamaludin, S. Z. H., Hamid, S. H. A., & Mohd Noor, S. N. A. (2020). Assessing the Challenges of Integration Affordable and Sustainable Housing from Economic Perspectives. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 498(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/498/1/012089
Tambe, E. B., Essaghah, A. E. A., Ikegbunam, F. I., Mbuka-Nwosu, I. E., Okafor, N. M., & Ekpe, I. N. (2023). Inspirational Influence of Nature in Architectural Design – A Review on the Scope of Application in Nigeria Housing Policy. Journal of Sustainability and Environmental Management, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.3126/josem.v2i4.61028
Teoh, C. T., Olanrewaju, A. L., & Tan, S. Y. (2018). Exploring housing governance in Malaysia. International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE), 7(3). https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.21.17176
Tracada, E., & Sorensen Allacci, M. A. (2023). Evaluating design features to support inclusive, self-directed, and active healthy living behaviours. Frontiers in Built Environment, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2023.1232248
Ullah, R., Ahmad, H., Rehman, F. U., & Fawad, A. (2023). Green innovation and Sustainable Development Goals in SMEs: the moderating role of government incentives. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 39(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-07-2021-0122
Ulrich, R. S. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224(4647). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.6143402
Ureta, J. C., Motallebi, M., Dickes, L., Clay, L., Ureta, J., & Baldwin, R. (2021). Understanding Stakeholders’ Knowledge, Awareness, and Perception of Conservation Programs in South Carolina. The Journal of South Carolina Water Resources, 7. https://doi.org/10.34068/jscwr.07.04
Vassiliades, C., Minterides, C., Astara, O. E., Barone, G., & Vardopoulos, I. (2023). Socio-Economic Barriers to Adopting Energy-Saving Bioclimatic Strategies in a Mediterranean Sustainable Real Estate Setting: A Quantitative Analysis of Resident Perspectives. Energies, 16(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/en16247952
Zulkifli, F., & Ismail, H. (2023). FACTORS INFLUENCING HOUSE BUYER’S DECISION IN MALAYSIA. CASE STUDY: SEPANG, SELANGOR. Planning Malaysia, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v21i27.1293
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright & Creative Commons Licence
eISSN: 0128-0945 © Year. The Authors. Published for Malaysian Institute of Planners. This is an open-access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
The authors hold the copyright without restrictions and also retain publishing rights without restrictions.
