RESIDENTS' PERCEPTION OF THE HABITABLE BUILT ENVIRONMENT QUALITY IN INFORMAL RIVERBANK SETTLEMENTS, CASE STUDY: JODIPAN COLORFUL VILLAGE, INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v23i39.1892Keywords:
Residents’ Perceptions, Livable Built Environments, Quality Assessment, Riverbank Settlement, Tourist LocationsAbstract
The transformation of Jodipan Colorful Village (Kampung Warna Warni Jodipan) from slums into tourist locations is leading to new activities in public spaces. However, these areas are not fully optimized as tourist locations due to the physical environment and residents' conditions factors. Evaluating the quality of the environment is crucial to creating comfort for residents and visitors while ensuring sustainability. The behaviour of these residents also plays a critical role in determining the quality of the environment. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the perception of residents in assessing and classifying the quality of livable built environments in the riverside settlements of Jodipan Colorful Village. The exploration was carried out in District 2 which was divided into sub-districts 6, 7, and 9. The data was collected through a questionnaire distributed to 169 respondents who reside in Jodipan Colorful Village and aged 17 years. Furthermore, data analysis adopted mean score analysis and instrument testing with validity and reliability tests. The results showed that all three sub-districts had medium quality levels where sub-district 6 achieved a mean score of 3.06 and sub-districts 7 as well as 9 both recorded 3.03. Residents positively evaluated physical aspects such as road conditions and roof quality while aspects including the location of settlements and street widths were viewed negatively. Despite these observed differences, the perceptions were useful for assessing environmental quality attributes. Consequently, physical aspects that moderately or adversely affected the quality of the village should be reviewed to maintain environmental quality and sustainability.
Downloads
References
Aliakbari, E., & Akbari, M. (2017). Interpretive-structural modeling of the factors that affect the viability of Tehran Metropolis. 1–31.
Anugrah, G., Nurhidayati, E., & Wulandari, A. (2021). Penilaian Kualitas Lingkungan Permukiman di Tepian Sungai Kelurahan Benua Melayu Laut Kecamatan Pontianak Selatan Berbasis Sistem Informasi Geografis. JeLAST: Jurnal PWK, Laut, Sipil, Dan Tambang, 8(2), 1–77.
Aru, P. B. A. W., Hidayati, A. N., & Poerwati, T. (2018). Pengaruh Program Kampung Warna-Warni Terhadap Peningkatan Kualitas Lingkungan. Eprints ITN Repository.
Aslim, N., Roihanah, I., Vidiyanti, C., & Hindami, H. (2014). Persepsi Masyarakat Terhadap Kualitas Lingkungan Permukiman. Temu Ilmiah IPLBI, 13–18.
Atika, F. A. (2020). Housing Quality pada Permukiman Informal Sempadan Rel Kereta Api, Dupak Magersari, Surabaya. E-Journal Institut Teknologi Adhitama Surabaya, 411–418. http://ejurnal.itats.ac.id/sntekpan/article/download/1266/1029#:~:text=Permukiman informal adalah lingkungan atau, liar’ dan “kumuh”.
Bahar, F., Yusran, Y. A., & Antariksa. (2019). Fenomena Rampsebagai Adaptasi Sirkulasi pada Permukiman Kampung Wisata Warna-Warni Jodipan Malang. EMARA: Indonesian Journal of Architecture.
Bwarlele, N., Kurniawati, D., & Meviana., i. (2023) Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Menjaga Kualitas Lingkungan Permukiman di Kelurahan Bandungrejosasi Kecamatan Sukun Kota Malang. JPIG (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Geografi).
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. Russell Sage Foundation
Cipta Karya. 2006. Penentuan Kualitas Permukiman. Departemen PU. Jakarta.
Dursun, P., & Saglamer, G. (2009). Analysing housing quality: Belerko housing settlement, Trabzon, Turkey. Open House International, 34(4), 46–56.
Ekartaji, P., Yunus, H. S., & Rahardjo, N. (2016). Kajian Kualitas Lingkungan Permukiman di Daerah Pinggiran Kota Kasus di Desa Ngestiharjo, Yogyakarta. 28(1), 96–102.
Fan, B., Isa, M. I., & Mohamed, B. (2024). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TOURIST EXPERIENCE, PLACE ATTACHMENT, AND POST-VISIT INTENTIONS: AN APPLICATION OF S-O-R PARADIGM IN THE CONTEXT OF HANGZHOU, CHINA. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 22(34)
Fitri, D. A. (2021). Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Munculnya Permukiman Kumuh Daerah Perkotaan Di Indonesia (Sebuah Studi Literatur). Journal Unesa, 1–9.
Furlan, R. (2016). Urban Design and Social Livability: The Revitalization of the Corniche in Doha. American Journal of Environmental Engineering, 6(3), 73–87.
Ghasemi, K., Hamzenejad, M., & Meshkini, A. (2018). The spatial analysis of the livability of 22 districts of Tehran Metropolis using multi-criteria decision-making approaches. Sustainable Cities and Society, 38(October 2017), 382–404.
Heylen, K. (2006). Liveability in social housing: three case studies in Flanders. ENHR Conference in an Expanding Europe: Theory, Policy, Implementation and Participation.
Kashef, M. (2016). Urban livability across disciplinary and professional boundaries. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 5(2), 239–253.
Kotler, & Amstrong. (2001). Prinsip – Prinsip Pemasaran. Jakarta: Erlangga
Kovacs-Györi, A., Ristea, A., Havas, C., Mehaffy, M., Hochmair, H. H., Resch, B., Juhasz, L., Lehner, A., Ramasubramanian, L., & Blaschke, T. (2020). Opportunities and challenges of geospatial analysis for promoting urban livability in the era of big data and machine learning. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(12).
Krisandriyana, M. (2017). Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Keberadaan Kawasan Permukiman Kumuh Di Surakarta. Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta.
Luhst, K. (1997). Real Estate Valuation; Principles and Applications. USA: Time Mirror Education Group.
Maru, A. C. H., & Hidayati, I. N. (2016). Pemanfaatan Citra Quickbird dan SIG untuk Pemetaan Tingkat Kenyamanan Permukiman di Kecamatan Semarang Barat dan Kecamatan Semarang Utara. Jurnal Bumi Indonesia, 5(1).
Minnery, J., Argo, T., Winarso, H., Hau, D., Veneracion, C. C., Forbes, D., & Childs, I. (2013). Slum upgrading and urban governance: Case studies in three South East Asian cities. Habitat International, 39, 162–169.
Mouratidis, K. (2021). Urban planning and quality of life: A review of pathways linking the built environment to subjective well-being. Cities, 115(February), 103229.
Mulligan, G., Carruthers, J., & Cahill, M. (2004). Urban quality of life and public policy: A survey. Contributions to Economic Analysis, 266, 729–802. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0573-8555(04)66023-8
Ningsih, T. R. (2017). Kampung Wisata Warna – Warni Jodipan Kota Malang Berkelanjutan Atau Sementara. Prosiding Scan #8: “Education...Putting ECO-DNA in Our Kids”.
Notoatmodjo. (2005). Metodologi Penelitian Kesehatan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Pangarso, F. (2017). Desain Lingkungan-binaan (“built-environment”) di Indonesia dalam menghadapi fenomena perkembangan teknologi di awal abad XXI.
PUPR., Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat Republik Indonesia Nomor 02/PRT/M/2016 Tentang Peningkatan Kualitas terhadap Perumahan Kumuh dan Permukiman Kumuh. Jakarta: Kementrian PUPR, 2016.
Pedro, J., Reis, A., Silva, C., & Pinheiro, M. D. (2021). Evaluating the economic benefits of moving from a single building to a community approach for sustainable urban redevelopment: Lisbon neighborhood case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 304, 126810.
Prabowo, W., & Rlly, R. (2021). Pengaruh Sungai Bengawan Solo Terhadap Sejarah Perkembangan Kota Surakarta. Teodolita: Media Komunkasi Ilmiah Di Bidang Teknik, 21(2).
Prasetyo, W. T., & Rahayu, S. (2013). Kajian Kualitas Permukiman Dengan Citra Quickbird Dan Sig Di Kecamatan Serengan Kota Surakarta. Jurnal Teknik PWK, 2(2), 293–302.
Sari, N. r., & Khadiyanto, P. (2014). Kualitas Lingkungan Permukiman Di Tepi Sungai Kelurahan Pelita, Kecamatan Samarinda Ilir. Teknik PWK, 3(4), 1002–1012.
Rapoport, A. (1983). Development, Culture Change, and Supportive Design. New York: Pergamon Press
Rasdi M. Rasdi, A. L., Som, M. A. P., & Shariffuddin, M. N. S. (2023). RESPONSIBLE TOURISM AND QUALITY OF LIFE AMONG THE LOCAL COMMUNITY IN CAMERON HIGHLANDS. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 21(25).
Ratnawati, N. R., Wulandai, L. D., & Antariksa. (2019). Aktivitas dan Synomorphy pada Ruang Publik Kampung Warna-warni Jodipan Kota Malang." Pawon, vol. 3, no. 01, 2019, pp. 57-68.
Robbin, P. S. (1996). Perilaku Organisasi: Konsep, kontroversi, aplikasi. Jilid I. Jakarta: PT. Prehallindo.
Sabila, F., & Caisarina, I. (2021). Identification of Characteristics of Slum Settlement on Krueng Daroy Riverbanks. 2, 40–48.
Sarwono, S. W. (1994). Psikologi Remaja. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada
Schiffman & Kanuk. 2004. Perilaku Konsumen (edisi 7). Jakarta: Prentice Hall.
Simamora, Bilson. (2008). Panduan Riset perilaku Konsumen. Cetakan ketiga, Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Simbang, A. (2019). Keterkaitan Partisipasi Masyarakat Terhadap Kualitas Lingkungan Permukiman Kumuh Di Kelurahan Rajawali Dan Kelurahan Budiman Kecamatan Jambi Timur Kota Jambi. Jurnal Pembangunan Berkelanjutan, 2(1), 74-89.
Soemarwoto, O. (1991). Analisis Dampak Lingkungan Cetakan ke 4. Gajah Mada University Press.
Stimson, R., & Marans, R. W. (2011). Objective measurement of quality of life using secondary data analysis. In R. W. Marans, & R. J. Stimson (Eds.), Social Indicators Research Series Investigating quality of urban life (pp. 33–45). Springer.
Suprijanto, I. (2002). Model Pengembangan Kawasan Kota Tepi Air. Makalah Pada KOLOKIUM Hasil Litbang PUSKIM.
Wulandari. L. D., Putri. D. H., Christina. A., & Romansyah. C. K. (2023). ‘DJODIPAN’ Kampung Wisata Tepian Sungai di Pusat Kota Malang. Malang: Mdza Media.
Yakob, H., Yusof, F., & Hamdan, H. (2012). Land Use Regulations Towards a Sustainable Urban Housing: Klang Valley Conurbation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 68, 578–589.
Yang, F., Lau, S. S. Y., & Qian, F. (2011). Urban design to lower summertime outdoor temperatures: An empirical study on high-rise housing in Shanghai. Building and Environment, 46(3), 769–785. doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.10.010
Yuan, L. L., Yuen, B., & Low, C. (1999). Quality of life in cities–definition, approaches and research. Urban quality of life: Critical issues and options. 1–13.
Yuliastuti, N., & Khaerunnisa, I. (2011). Kualitas Lingkungan Permukiman Kawasan Pecinan Kota Semarang Nany Yuliastuti *), Isti Khaerunnisa **). Teknik, 32(3), 212–217.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright & Creative Commons Licence
eISSN: 0128-0945 © Year. The Authors. Published for Malaysian Institute of Planners. This is an open-access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
The authors hold the copyright without restrictions and also retain publishing rights without restrictions.
