LANGUAGES, PLACES, AND PEACE: ETHNIC HARMONY ACROSS URBAN AND RURAL SABAH, MALAYSIA

Authors

  • Jeannet Stephen Borneo Institute for Indigenous Studies, UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA SABAH
  • Rosazman Hussin Borneo Institute for Indigenous Studies, UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA SABAH
  • Suraya Sintang Centre for the Promotion of Knowledge and Language, UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA SABAH
  • Siti Aidah Lokin Centre for the Promotion of Knowledge and Language, UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA SABAH
  • Johan Johnes Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA SABAH

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v23i38.1854

Keywords:

linguistic diversity, ethnic harmony, Sabah, place of residence, language attitudes

Abstract

This study tackles two research questions: RQ1: Do positive attitudes toward linguistic diversity foster ethnic harmony? and RQ2: Does place of residence influence that relationship? Surveys with 2,725 adults in seven districts of Sabah, Malaysia, captured daily language use, support for linguistic diversity, and perceived inter-ethnic harmony. Overall, respondents expressed strong approval of linguistic diversity and high levels of harmony. Statistical testing confirmed that favourable diversity attitudes are a consistent predictor of harmony, addressing RQ1. A follow-up comparison of urban and rural respondents revealed that this attitude–harmony link is noticeably stronger in rural districts, where mother-tongue use remains part of everyday life - thereby answering RQ2. In urban centres, well-established intercultural activities appear to provide a baseline of harmony, making individual attitudes less decisive. These findings suggest that social-cohesion efforts should be tailored to local contexts. Rural areas can benefit from low-cost, community-run initiatives such as heritage-language media, mother-tongue classes, and intergenerational storytelling, which reinforce positive diversity attitudes already aligned with daily practice. Urban settings, meanwhile, should focus on keeping intercultural programmes genuinely engaging rather than tokenistic. By showing how linguistic attitudes and residential context work together to shape harmony, the study offers a practical framework for other multi-ethnic societies aiming to turn cultural diversity into a shared strength.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdul Latip, N., Umar, M. U., Yusoh, M. P., Mansur, K., Hua, A. K., Hussin, R., & Datu Nordin, D. S. N. (2023). SUSTAINABLE URBAN PARK: A CASE STUDIES OF TAMAN AWAM TELUK LIKAS, KOTA KINABALU, SABAH. MALAYSIA. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 21(28). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v21i28.1333

Banban, D. (2018). Harmony in diversity: An empirical study of harmonious co-existence in the multi-ethnic culture of Qinghai. International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41257-018-0010-6

Benu, N. N., Artawa, I. K., Satyawati, M. S., & Purnawati, K. W. (2023). Local language vitality in Kupang city, Indonesia: A linguistic landscape approach. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 10(1), 2153973. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2022.2153973

Blommaert, J., & Rampton, B. (2011). Language and superdiversity. Diversities, 13(2), 1–21. http://www.unesco.org/shs/diversities/vol13/issue2/art1

Chan, M. (2016). Language and inter-racial harmony: The battle for English as Singapore lingua. Paper presented at the Asian Conference on Asian Studies (ACAS 2016), Kobe, Japan. https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/1977

Duarte, J., & Gogolin, I. (Eds.). (2013). Linguistic superdiversity in urban areas: Research approaches (Vol. 2). John Benjamins Publishing.

Gavin, M. C., Botero, C. A., Bowern, C., Colwell, R. K., Dunn, M., Dunn, R. R., Gray, R. D., Kirby, K. R., McCarter, J., Powell, A., Rangel, T. F., Stepp, J. R., Trautwein, M., Verdolin, J. L., & Yanega, G. (2013). Toward a mechanistic understanding of linguistic diversity. BioScience, 63(7), 524–535. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2013.63.7.6

Isar, Y. R. (2016). Towards creative urban diversity: From the ‘multicultural’ to the ‘intercultural’ . In UNESCO (Ed.), Culture: urban future – Global report on culture for sustainable urban development (pp. 139-147). UNESCO Publishing.

Pérez Báez, G. (2018). Linguistic diversity, language vitality and the advancement of Linguistics as a science. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia, 50 (2), 180–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2018.1434730

Pimid, M., Abdul Latip, N., Marzuki, A., Umar, M. U., & Krishnan, K. T. (2020). STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT OF CONSERVATION IN LOWER KINABATANGAN SABAH. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 18(13). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v18i13.776

Schreiber, F., & Carius, A. (2016). The inclusive city: Urban planning for diversity and social cohesion. In G. Gardner, T. Prugh, & M. Renner (Eds.), State of the world: Can a city be sustainable? (pp. 317–335). Island Press.

Siemund, P. (2023). Multilingual Development: English in a Global Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sintang, S. (2014). Peaceful co-existence in religious diversity in Sabah, Malaysia. Global Journal of Human-Social Science: Arts & Humanities – Psychology, 14(1), 67–77

Sintang, S. (2024, September 23). Understanding Sabah’s exemplary interfaith relations from a grassroots perspective (ISEAS Perspective No. 2024/73). ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute

Spolsky, B. (2009). Language management. Cambridge University Press

Downloads

Published

2025-11-26

How to Cite

Stephen, J., Hussin, R., Sintang, S., Lokin, S. A., & Johnes, J. (2025). LANGUAGES, PLACES, AND PEACE: ETHNIC HARMONY ACROSS URBAN AND RURAL SABAH, MALAYSIA. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 23(38). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v23i38.1854

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>