CHALLENGES AND READINESS FOR THE URBAN RENEWAL ACT: PERSPECTIVES OF TOWN PLANNERS IN PENANG

Authors

  • Suraiyati Rahman School of Housing, Building and Planning, UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA
  • Lai Chin Wei School of Housing, Building and Planning, UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA
  • Nurul Ashikin Mabahwi School of Housing, Building and Planning, UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v23i38.1845

Keywords:

Urban renewal, Urban Renewal Act, challenges, readiness and strategies

Abstract

Malaysia’s proposed Urban Renewal Act (URA) represents a major policy effort to revitalise ageing urban areas through a unified legal and institutional framework. However, as the Act has not yet been gazetted, questions remain about the readiness of institutions and communities to implement it effectively. This study examines institutional and community preparedness for the URA, focusing on Penang as a case study where urban development intersects with heritage conservation. A qualitative approach was adopted, involving semi-structured interviews with practising town planners from the government and private sectors. Thematic analysis revealed four key challenges, legal uncertainty, fragmented coordination, financial constraints, and low community trust. Institutional readiness was found to be partial, as technical capacity exists, but coordination and procedural clarity are lacking. Community readiness remains weak due to limited awareness and mistrust of redevelopment intentions. Guided by Institutional Readiness Theory, the study concludes that Malaysia exhibits high commitment but low efficacy for implementing the URA. Strengthening inter-agency collaboration, establishing clear procedural frameworks, and enhancing public communication are critical steps toward operational readiness. The findings contribute to understanding how policy innovation in Malaysia’s urban governance can evolve from legislative ambition to practical, inclusive reform.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Bunnell, T. (2002). Kampung rules: Landscape and the contested government of urban(e) Malayness. Urban Studies, 39(9), 1685–1701. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980220151727

Che Pin, S. F., Alias, A., Nordin, N. A., Senawi, A., & Mohamed Saraf, M. H. (2024). Challenges in implementing urban land readjustment (ULR) in Malaysia from town planner’s perspectives. Planning Malaysia, 22(34). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v22i34.1573

Couch, C., Sykes, O., & Börstinghaus, W. (2011). Thirty years of urban regeneration in Britain, Germany and France: The importance of context and path dependency. Progress in Planning, 75(1), 1–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2010.12.001

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.

Davidson, M., & Lees, L. (2005). New-build gentrification and London’s riverside renaissance. Environment and Planning A, 37(7), 1165–1190. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3739

Department of Statistics Malaysia (DOSM). (2021). Population and housing census of Malaysia 2020. Putrajaya: DOSM.

Department of Statistics Malaysia (DOSM). (2024). Current population estimates, Malaysia, 2024. Putrajaya: DOSM.

Dobbs, S., & Loh, K. (2021). The origins of urban renewal in Singapore: A transnational history. Journal of Urban History, 49(1), 60–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0096144220985521

Eni, S., Omar, A. J., Radzuan, I. S., Sulaiman, N. N., & Shamsudin, Z. (2025). Evolution of urban regeneration in Malaysia. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(4), 3061–3072. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.906000225

Guest, G., Namey, E., & Chen, M. (2020). A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research. PLoS ONE, 15(7), e0232076. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232076

Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. (2021). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523

Kundu, D. (2014). Urban development programmes in India: A critique of JnNURM. Social Change, 44(4), 615–632. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049085714548546

Marzukhi, M. A., Omar, D., & Hoon Leh, O. L. (2018). Re-appraising regulatory framework of planning and land law system towards sustainable development in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Behavioural Studies, 3(9), 153–163. https://doi.org/10.21834/ajbes.v3i9.70

Morshidi, S. (2014). Heritage-led regeneration in George Town: Challenges of inclusivity and governance. Kajian Malaysia, 32(1), 23–45.

Nik Hashim, N. H., Md. Dali, M., & Alias, A. (2023). Developing sustainable urban regeneration (SUR) evaluation method for the Malaysian context. Planning Malaysia, 21(30). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v21i30.1389

Patterson, J., & Huitema, D. (2018). Institutional innovation in urban governance: The case of climate change adaptation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(3), 374–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2018.1510767

PLANMalaysia. (2018). Garis panduan pelaksanaan pembaharuan semula bandar. Federal Department of Town and Country Planning, Putrajaya.

Roberts, P., & Sykes, H. (2008). Urban regeneration: A handbook (2nd ed.). Sage.

Roberts, P., Sykes, H., & Granger, R. (2011). Urban regeneration: A handbook. Sage.

Roosli, R., Malik, S., Wahid, J., & Nesadurai, H. (2019). Appraisal of urbanisation, township and housing trends for a desired future in Malaysia. Planning Malaysia, 17(10). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v17i10.629

Shin, H. B. (2016). Economic transition and speculative urbanisation in China: Gentrification versus dispossession. Urban Studies, 53(3), 471–489. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015597111

Soo, W. J. (2025, September 1). Malaysia’s case for the Urban Renewal Act: Housing minister explains why it can’t wait. Malay Mail. https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2025/09/01/malaysias-case-for-the-urban-renewal-act-housing-minister-explains-why-it-cant-wait/189483

UNESCO. (2011). Operational guidelines for the implementation of the World Heritage Convention. UNESCO World Heritage Centre.

Vangen, S., Hayes, J., & Cornforth, C. (2015). Governing cross-sector, inter-organizational collaborations. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1237–1260. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.903658

Weiner, B. J. (2009). A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implementation Science, 4(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-67

Weller, S., Vickers, B., Bernard, H., Blackburn, A., Borgatti, S., Gravlee, C., & Johnson, J. (2018). Open-ended interview questions and saturation. PLoS ONE, 13(6), e0198606. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198606

Wu, Y., Galdini, R., Hui, E. C., & Long, H. (2020). Urban regeneration and re-use: China and Europe. Cities, 106, 102863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102863

Ye, L., Peng, X., Aniche, L. Q., Scholten, P. H., & Ensenado, E. M. (2021). Urban renewal as policy innovation in China: From growth stimulation to sustainable development. Public Administration and Development, 41(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1903

Yung, E. H., & Chan, E. H. (2011). Problem issues of public participation in built-heritage conservation: Two controversial cases in Hong Kong. Habitat International, 35(3), 457–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.12.004

Downloads

Published

2025-11-26

How to Cite

Rahman, S., Wei, L. C., & Mabahwi, N. A. (2025). CHALLENGES AND READINESS FOR THE URBAN RENEWAL ACT: PERSPECTIVES OF TOWN PLANNERS IN PENANG. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 23(38). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v23i38.1845

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2